The 2A4 report will only apply to the 2A4, if it applied to all of them, your report would’ve been marked as “duplicate” rather than “not a bug”. That’s how my reports are marked if they apply to multiple vehicles, but if a report was already previously created & forwarded for a vehicle with identical characteristics (as such it will apply to all of them), it’s duplciate.
So again, you were calling me deluded… but yet you’re pulling at straws.
your sources for stating the fov of the sights are russian sources wich gaijin already denied the use of russian sources to prove a nato vehicle wrong and not only that but the sources are wrong the fabricant of the sights state the real magnification of such sights
I just sent the correct source about EMES-15A2 directly to the technical moderator
The issue is based on the fact that the German 2A5/6/7, Spanish Leopard 2E, and Swedish Strv 122 use the same EMES-15A2 but have different daytime sight magnifications.
Ralin is right, this has been checked and reported back.
I’m gonna call you that again
Wait that’s funny, what he’s just posted is the source I brought to the forum (via a report) to prove the 40/40 gun-handling is correct, and even sent you it on discord - but you had told me it’s a typo.
The double standards hahaha.
this is not even about the sight its about the laser rangefinder
That’s not my acceptance, it’s another moderator’s.
if he is talking about this, this is not even from the sight directly this is data about the rangefinder on the sight
Magnification is mentioned in there.
“- Powiększenie: 12-krotne”
Right, so let me get this straight;
Hello, what are these double standards supposed to be?
better question is, who can we send the report to so it gets accepted so the gun handling gets improved
Again, it’s not something I accepted. Also, the report is based on not just that one, it multiple secondary sources.
I didn’t even touch that report
I didn’t even check that report, what was the primary source?
Btw, has it ever been stated that sight magnifications are modelled after the day channel even?
@_David_Bowie Do you know? Since I’ve never heard of that.
just so you know Sources from KMW Rheinmetall and the Bundeswehr where said to be not useable from what i saw on Reports
You are sorely mistaken. There are good documents about all of them
That standard has always been used, a few vehicles misreport and use values from thermal but basically all use values from the daytime sights
A former friend of mine, Yedidya, had made a report using 10+ sources about how the thermal sight of the T-80BVM was only able to output 640x512 pixels, aka, making it a 2nd generation (bordering on 1st generation) sight via Gaijin standards of the time, that was in light of the Leopard 2PLs thermal sight, which output 768x512 pixel being modelled as 2nd generation only until very recently where their standards changed to model thermal generation by what it is classified in real life, regardless of their actual output.
Good documents you say?
