Already made by somebody Community Bug Reporting System
the spall liner one probably is the most important, @Toxindragon wanted to ask some canadian tankers if the spall liners were only turret or chassis as well
Not sure how important the radio part is
Turret only is what he said. I’ll see if I can find some sources.
in that case the pictures here should suffice, shouldnt they? At least last i knew gajin was more open for the spall liner cases Leopard 2A4M CAN: The Maple Leaf Leopard - #531 by Sad_Lewd
He’s actually the person I asked lol
kek
Bug report on the absence of a bulldozer blade. Additional protection will only be a plus:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Elnw0Jm1ZD75
If I remember correctly on the KMW website the 2a4M listing was pretty much the entire package ordered by Canada. Its just that a country can order whatever they want so a 2a4M is whatever someone would have wanted.
Stealing this image from @Sad_Lewd, the return roller configuration indicates the hull to be a pre-5th batch hull. This means it has B-Tech internal composites, as C-Tech was introduced with the 6th batch.
Spoiler
i mean, it doesnt get the beak armor, so might as well take the bulldozer plate as heat armor at least
it’s DM63A1 for service 2PL
Man I just love seeing these “Sweden is the main nation” or “Sweden better than Germany” only because they have very good top tier while rest of the tt is lacking.
Its been updated now “not a bug” because “it was originally planned to be sold without a dozer blade”
Which doesn’t make sense, especially since this is supposed to be the one IN SERVICE, not one that is BEING SOLD.
Both?!?!
yes, but US crew not UK or canadian itself yet
Still better than German ^^
it looks like we will need a better source, some text piece would be best Community Bug Reporting System
This tank is supposed to have a similar armor of the 2A7 but for now it’s just a copy past of the 2A4 with just 200mm of additional armor
ehh not realy, gajin said ***** in their dev blog