Legend of Victory: T-34-85 “Partisan”

you didn’t seem to care about trolly armor when you brought up those m61 vs panther images, why does trollynes matter now?

1 Like

thats the centurion 1

Theres a reason why jumbos are so high br these days… as u can eliminate weakspots with bushes and u have apcr against panthers and shooting cupola works for tigers and is-2.

Side armor is paper with 38mm but if u dont suck u can shred whole teams apart. Or u used to be able to, before they added artillery and sweden apds, israel heat and wheeled flankers. At that br.

BR-471 vs Centurion Mk3

BR-471B vs Cent Mk3

BR-471D vs Cent. Mk3

What trolly bits? The hull machine gun? Because that also heavily applies to all USA vehicles, everyone already knows that.

Yes it does make sense… it’s logical, it’s not getting add on armor, it’s getting a gimmick. That is only effective when stopping for the most part. Tack on an additionally 30mm frontal and 20mm side armor, and boost the HP by 150 and then we will make it 6.0 or 6.3.

I tried this. Went terribly. Non-penned a Tiger 1 twice, then ghost rounded 3 times. Out of 10 shots fired. Soooo good.

Hey, not my fault if ure aiming bad… the capped ammo is better, even if u believe otherwise… would say u should listen to better players… bud u dont listen to me so why u would listen to them?

Stabi t34.85 will not come and stay at 6.0. And what is that for an argument that u need to stop for shooting? The stabi is excakly for the opposide, to shoot while driving. Why would i need to stop?

If that think comes at 6.0 without br 367 i garante u u i will do a 70% winrate with it. And with the br 367 likely even 75%.

Still undecided if I should grind this one.
It will be good SL printer and the grind will be relatively short, but I have already USSR researched past rank 4 and the tank is just a copy of tech tree version (I don’t care about the skin).
Plus there is nothing in Warbond shop, that I would really like and thus grind for along this event.

U mean the prem? If it is rank 3 its not good for sl… i tell u that.

Highest premium vehicle, I have, is 5.3, so still the best one for me. Plus I am sure I would do well in it.

EDIT: Now thinking about this, it is the highest BR Premium event vehicle that I remember. So, it seems like a good reason for getting it.

Rank 3 prems are in every warbond shop. So if u wanna collect them, try the warbond shop. Its 100% free. That how i got a lot of prems, even the now rank 4 t20 that was 5.3 rank 3 back then

Just saing

But the difference from 400% to 550%+ in rewards is insane. Instead of 60k u get 100k sl, at least from how it feels. Will check the calc later.

I don’t think you understand what a thing about the game, which is unfortunate given your amount of played matches.
And unfortunately you like many people seemingly are way too biased to have a valid opinion on these vehicles.

It isn’t getting BR-367 no idea where you pulled that from

It’s getting a similar stabalizer to that of the Sherman’s which are 3.3 and up.

And oooh i apparently have bad aim? Why did I get a 14k 0 death, with a nuke game, after I swapped back to my normal BR-365s? Because they are better.

1 Like

I think we can stop right here… calling me an idiot is one thing, but saying i am biased and have no clue about the game? Have u ever checked my profile? I give u a hint… i am quite good positioned in the top few % of all Players of this game (grb)… having played all nations and almost all planes and tank… and u call me a guy with no expirience that is biased?

I just tell u the truth… a t34-85 with stabilizer would be absurdly broken at 6.0… and the 85mm capped ammo is the best amm the t34-85 has… believe me… i have almost 65% winrate overall in that thing…and recend 30 days would even be higher…

wish we would get statcard signatures in this forum… so u see instandly where everyone is coming from… and how much value his words have, when they talk about game machanics and stuff…

1 Like

You are biased.

Otherwise, since all Sherman’s are stabilized, with good secondary characteristics, they ALL should go up in br no?

3 Likes

Why are we talking about shermans now? And no, they should not.

Shermans are bigger, slower, have a BIG soft turred, are onehit by almost anythink, haveing almost no side armor, having a very very bad reverse. U just CANT compare the Sherman to a Medium tank. As it really isnt able to do Medium tank stuff. And dare u miss your hit, with that reverse/insane big turred u will likely not be able to get away with that, once u made enough way to hide the “middle” of your turred in the T-34, the enemy will unlikely be

The Sherman is almost on paar with a PzIV, if it wouldnt have the stabi it should not be higher then 4.7-5.0, at the BR of the T34-57 and KV-85.

and one last time… the capped APHE is so fucking much better on the 85mm…

just go into the analys… angle the sherman so u get yellow with the 365K or even Red with the M62 and then try the Capped 365… maybe u finally understand the brokenness of the Capped 85mm…


1 Like

This is priceless, you actually think they are equal to a Pz. IV, now your just trolling.

1 Like

Is bending my word your way of argumenting now? I repeat…

Almost on paar with a pz4 and would be not higher then br 4.7-5.0.

But thats really it man… i am open to have discussions and talks… and also harsh discussions are fine.

But u dont bring arguments anymore.

if all stabilised tanks automatically are OP, let’s just put every Sherman at 11.0….

1 Like

It’s not much, but the add on armor on the UFP is still nice.

It’s a shame these new point based event vehicles always have such low SL modifiers. The T-V and Iron Duke sit at 1.6, the KV-220 at 1.66, even the Boarhound at 3.0 has 1.24, almost matching the 1.35 of the T-34-85 Partisan.