Why are we talking about shermans now? And no, they should not.
Shermans are bigger, slower, have a BIG soft turred, are onehit by almost anythink, haveing almost no side armor, having a very very bad reverse. U just CANT compare the Sherman to a Medium tank. As it really isnt able to do Medium tank stuff. And dare u miss your hit, with that reverse/insane big turred u will likely not be able to get away with that, once u made enough way to hide the “middle” of your turred in the T-34, the enemy will unlikely be
The Sherman is almost on paar with a PzIV, if it wouldnt have the stabi it should not be higher then 4.7-5.0, at the BR of the T34-57 and KV-85.
and one last time… the capped APHE is so fucking much better on the 85mm…
just go into the analys… angle the sherman so u get yellow with the 365K or even Red with the M62 and then try the Capped 365… maybe u finally understand the brokenness of the Capped 85mm…
It’s not much, but the add on armor on the UFP is still nice.
It’s a shame these new point based event vehicles always have such low SL modifiers. The T-V and Iron Duke sit at 1.6, the KV-220 at 1.66, even the Boarhound at 3.0 has 1.24, almost matching the 1.35 of the T-34-85 Partisan.
The updated 3D model is incredible, just like T-34/85 D-5T’s which came before;
However, I can see that the armor is the same as the old one. I was hoping for it to get an armor remaster into volumetric as well, just like D_5T did- is this planned, or was this meant to be only a visual update?
It gives you the first shot everytime you meet a non stablalized tank that isnt a stationary, you can also be a lot more aggressive. Its as big a deal as thermals if not more which is at least a .3 br increase if we look at similar situations in the tree of the same vic but gets thermals.
