It already does on all tabs.
Didnt a second ago, but is now, weird
Laser guided munition tracking issue // Gaijin.net // Issues Wanna add your information to my bug report? Had this up for a while now so more information would be great, especially seeing how we got 44 others with the same issue and some people have listed what other aircraft & bombs they’ve seen it with.
1 Like
Just Tested it on the GBU-48 which has also an Track Rate of 10k, you can see for like half an second that ig wants to fly somewhere else, but something holds it on the Laser Point
Tested now Low alt/High Alt/Tossing around…
1 Like
I forwarded multiple reports onto Smin including some from only a few weeks ago and I was told they were too old to be submitted or something. So I wrote a new one
2 Likes
Close, Nearly got it first try…
(I have nothing to add at this time, just wanted to say I am grateful to everyone here who is using their time and effort to help get this bug fixed. Thank you guys! 🍻)
3 Likes
Hmm, I wonder if the IOG+GNSS help it stay on course. I’ve noticed that standard IOG+GNSS bombs like the GBU-38 track onto the designated spot without an issue at altitude still.
1 Like
1 Like
Yep only took a few times messaging it
2 Likes
@Morvran I found something from 2 Months ago
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/to1qYHQDsmyO
Its allready been Accepted since 2 damn months
1 Like
Interesting, good find, but hopefully when combined with my report it shows a far wider issue that hopefully will be fixed sometime this decade
1 Like
Yeah, I reported it two months ago before the other one with about 50 other people clicking the “I have the same issue” and reporting other aircrafts/bombs affected. Still not accepted. I don’t expect this to be fixed any time soon.
If it’s been that long and it has not been looked at you can message one of the Technical Moderators to ask about it. You can find all the teams and the areas they handle listed here: (Who is who and Reporting Procedure). If you don’t get an answer within a few days you can add more moderators from the list to the original message instead of sending a new message (that way you preserve the date of the message and it doesn’t look like a new request), adding one of the moderators to the message every 2-3 days or so until you get an answer.
Please do not to add the seniors until you have tried all other regular moderators, the Seniors likely won’t answer unless they are added and pinged by the regular moderators but if you’ve added all the regular moderators with no answer then you can add the seniors.
In fairness I did try that (with both reports I found and my own initial report on the issue), gave up and just DMed Smin who told me the reports were too old or had issues and they needed new ones, which is why I wrote my new report for the issue.
Which then took 2 DMs and 1 public tag in the R&R thread to actually get passed.
I get they are volunteers, but there were dozens of reports over a few months and not one had been passed… It was really wierd. Granted the reports were kinda mixed in quality, but some were more than good enough.
Though I have a few other reports not yet accepted which ive DMed to a few TMs already… I think its due another round of DMs such as this Harrier Report
But this is a good idea i’ll try in the future
2 Likes
Why are they taking so long to fix this, and why don’t they even accept the bug reports?
1 Like
Mine eventually got accepted. But yeah. Its wierd it took so long.
If there is no sign of a fix on the dev server/patch notes. Im gunna make a dev forum post about it. Do some butt kicking.
A dozen+ weapons not working for 2 months is just insane
2 Likes
As Morvran_ said, this has been done and nothing so far. It does look like two reports got “accepted” on the Bug Report website but who knows if that will actually be followed up on seeing how many others have been accepted for years.
Does this table explain why the Martels keep missing? And what is PID?
2 Likes