Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

You mean the ME-101 :P

Spoiler

Airbus Spain AFJT (Airbus Future Jet Trainer) Advanced Jet Trainer Concept

Momento épico O.O

Today I learned!

1 Like

Ngl it looks like a budget F-16 lol

“Hey airbus, you can copy my homework just make it look different”

1 Like

German one when ?

image

Though tbh I think this is more likely to come more than the ICE

Don’t photoshop pls ! They still think it’s real. :D :D :D

I am in favor of many things, even some vehicles captured in combat. But my limit is those tested/evaluated vehicles. If we enter that terrain, everything completely blurs. You have to be very careful there.

I can speak for my country, which in the last ten years has tested at least seven fighters (Kfir, Mirage F1, F-16, Tejas, FC-1C/JF-17, MiG 35 and FA-50).

I imagine there are many similar cases, therefore I am opposed to this, it will get out of control.

1 Like

What happens if I told you we are already there

Looks at half of the Swedish heli line and the T-80

I know it and I hate it. Imagine that in every TT

1 Like

Since apparently any British territory that remotely considered US vehicles means the go in the UK tree, I want vehicles from every country that was and currently is occupied by the US.

2 Likes

Well the Australian and new Zealand head of state is King Charles and they still are under our rule and still have the Union flag in their flag so it make sense for there tech to be in our tree

Not too mention both are members of the commonwealth. If that is enough justification for both SA and India (Despite the fact both kinda hate us right now, and in SA case I dont think they ever really liked being part of the Commonwealth) then that should be plenty for Australia, NZ and Canada. Everything else, like the fact they are commonwealth realms, close trade and security partners, etc, is just icing on the cake

Heck as far as I am aware, RAF pilots still occasionally train in Canada.

1 Like

I also found this Intresting

“Because the King spends most of his time outside of New Zealand, he is represented by the Governor-General in her absence. The King appoints governors-general, who have essentially the same powers that he does, for a five-year term on the advice of the New Zealand prime minister.”

So technically the Royals have more power over there than over here

If that is a C&P, someone really needs to update that page :D

Eh… but not really. Governor-Generals have no more or less power than the monarch has in the UK. They do the same thing. They just operate on their behalf. Its 95% ceremonial

1 Like

I’ve tried to update from Queen to king : D

https://gg.govt.nz/office-governor-general/roles-and-functions-governor-general/constitutional-role/queen-public-ceremonial-roles#:~:text=Because%20the%20Queen%20spends%20most,the%20New%20Zealand%20prime%20minister.

Ah…

1 Like

But ether way the RNZAF head is the New Zealand government and the head of the Government is the King and he is also our head of state.

So yea RNZAF F-16 please

I am surprised they didnt take that option. I guess they just wanted to avoid giving every nation an F-16 and chose the nations they liked first.

1 Like

Mhm yea I’m surprised there are NZ serial numbers for these still logged and public avaliable.

http://www.adf-serials.com.au/nz-serials/nzf-16.htm