Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

I’m feeling lucky 🤞

I have shown you and you attempted to deny the evidence, so I find this to be quite a funny comment.

Listen, he’s not even denying the evidence anymore after seeing it so please chill and stop trying too make this a bigger deal than it is ok?

2 Likes

you’ve shown me evidence and im showing differences between the cannons to see if we can find more info about the cannon in any moment im not denying the fact that its working as of right now im just stating the differences

There is me sitting at the back not dare to make a joke with this conversation

Rafaello
image
image

6 Likes

No not that one lol easier if I DM it to you hehe

don’t anger the French again

Hon hon, I eat le snail

i will say tho the HE TF thing seems to be real since the russian media stated that the 2S38 uses a HE TF similar working to the PUMA except this one does big boom, seems like its real taking in count it has a muzzle coil programmer
image

Pfff the T-14 isnt even ready yet, additonaly a lot russian on the ru forum seem to call it only equal to old leopard 2a7 variants, they moan and moan how the t 14 chassis sucks lol

Dose anyone notice that Strikemaster is lack off the plus machine gun pods show on the dev

are we discussing the date of introduction or performances ?

by date rafale f4 is entering service as we speak

by performances, well it depends what you want to do. Rafale is a better bomber, tho this advantage gets reduced as you go in the upper tranches of eurofighters. Ef likely is better at BVR (tho meteor on each aircraft means the difference is probably minimal)

as for dogfighting ? neither of us know what the real performances of both are. Both are very maneuverable however, that much is sure

as for the rafale leak, it’s fake (or a model used for a mod maybe, one was published a year ago or so)

1 Like

No we are screaming

1 Like

crazy how this all started cuz of a rafaello fake leak

1 Like

I’m afraid that real life performance doesn’t necessarily translate to the game.
On paper it’s a solidly armored yet quite mobile IFV that packs incredible firepower, so I’d expect it to be strong in game.

Whether the vehicle is ready or not irl doesn’t matter, so long as it’s functional, which both T-14 and T-15 are.

Not sure what you were trying to convey here other than your dislike for the platform.

1 Like

Unless Gaijin considers there to be not enough sources available to properly add it to the game.

Like for example the Challenger 3 and borderline M1A2 SEPv3 one or two years ago.

So we habe the JH7A and the updated mi8 (along with some interesting movement on the soviet dc3 bomber), any other surprises i should know about?

I am just saying that russia isnt even ready yet to realy produce them, on paper they might look good, but when we learned one thing it was that russian equipment isnt realy performing great.
And i would say a vehicle should be finished and ready in real life first at least for top modern stuff or else we will run around with only half finished prototypes everywhere.
The addition of the T-15 is far away ,first gonna be stuff like BMPT and the kurganez 25 which will be added

With all the guesstimations around top tier I barely consider this an issue in all honesty.
Hell, Gaijin added the Ostwind II on the basis of a small note somewhere without images of it.

1 Like