oh that one, yeah didnt look like anything special and doubt gonna be a pack one
sad that we’ll see no sea lynx :{
Likely GE yeah.
Though I’m pretty interested in it if it stays 7.7, as I have a pretty good lineup there. I doubt it will move up to 8.0, where it would just be a worse M60 due to the longish reload.
jup likely, the real big bangg money maker just still feels to be missing, naval… well lets just say it is arguable
1 Like
Then Gripen B and D on ETSP can be candidate? It’s not private owned but under MoD’s ETSP.
1 Like
Given it’s unarmed I doubt it, even though there are tons of aircraft with ether Ahistorical or fictional loadouts
our most likely guess currently is either the training model grippen the uk has or a south african grippen
1 Like
Btw I know about the D variant but where did we own the B ?
Actually they first leased Gripen B in 1999. In 2006 new agreement to change Gripen B with Gripen D was assigned.
1 Like
Ah ok cheers m8
Was the B armed ?
Hey up Motherhen is typing :D
Both was only for test pilot role but AFAIK they don’t have difference with in-service swedish Gripens
1 Like
Aircraft Carrier control inputs have been added to the files: ( War-Thunder-Datamine/gui.vromfs.bin_u/wt/config/hud.blkx at master · gszabi99/War-Thunder-Datamine · GitHub )
( Aircraft Carriers - WT Discussion - #43 by Motherhen357 )
12 Likes
If we are getting playable carriers I’m gonna loose my mind. That would be so awesome.
5 Likes
So it’s just the same aircraft as the operational ones but with all the bells and whistle removed.
Ok then :D
I hope this follows the previous patterns of having an event plane with a started one like the Marine Tornado.
It’s Battlefield 1942 all over again lol
1 Like
A man of culture.
1 Like
It 's similar in in concept to how WT Mobile 's carriers work( War-Thunder-Mobile-Datamine/game.vromfs.bin_u/game/es/aircraft_carrier_unit_spawn.das at master · gszabi99/War-Thunder-Mobile-Datamine · GitHub ), but WT 's version has extended functionalities - " hunt ", " defend ", and " fly to (location ) ".
2 Likes
I remember a report of the type 10 Made by the US and Japan that said the type 10 passed all the armor tests, and not only the armor was at the level of the leopard 2A7 but it had an armor to weight ratio effectivity of over 40% imma try to find the archive since a Lot of the type 10 info was recently declassified
4 Likes
i can see that very well being the case, seeing how the type 10 is a new generation tank model
2 Likes