Kings of Battle - Rumor Round-Up and Discussion (Part 2)

Don’t photoshop pls ! They still think it’s real. :D :D :D

I am in favor of many things, even some vehicles captured in combat. But my limit is those tested/evaluated vehicles. If we enter that terrain, everything completely blurs. You have to be very careful there.

I can speak for my country, which in the last ten years has tested at least seven fighters (Kfir, Mirage F1, F-16, Tejas, FC-1C/JF-17, MiG 35 and FA-50).

I imagine there are many similar cases, therefore I am opposed to this, it will get out of control.

1 Like

What happens if I told you we are already there

Looks at half of the Swedish heli line and the T-80

I know it and I hate it. Imagine that in every TT

1 Like

Since apparently any British territory that remotely considered US vehicles means the go in the UK tree, I want vehicles from every country that was and currently is occupied by the US.

2 Likes

Well the Australian and new Zealand head of state is King Charles and they still are under our rule and still have the Union flag in their flag so it make sense for there tech to be in our tree

Not too mention both are members of the commonwealth. If that is enough justification for both SA and India (Despite the fact both kinda hate us right now, and in SA case I dont think they ever really liked being part of the Commonwealth) then that should be plenty for Australia, NZ and Canada. Everything else, like the fact they are commonwealth realms, close trade and security partners, etc, is just icing on the cake

Heck as far as I am aware, RAF pilots still occasionally train in Canada.

1 Like

I also found this Intresting

“Because the King spends most of his time outside of New Zealand, he is represented by the Governor-General in her absence. The King appoints governors-general, who have essentially the same powers that he does, for a five-year term on the advice of the New Zealand prime minister.”

So technically the Royals have more power over there than over here

If that is a C&P, someone really needs to update that page :D

Eh… but not really. Governor-Generals have no more or less power than the monarch has in the UK. They do the same thing. They just operate on their behalf. Its 95% ceremonial

1 Like

I’ve tried to update from Queen to king : D

https://gg.govt.nz/office-governor-general/roles-and-functions-governor-general/constitutional-role/queen-public-ceremonial-roles#:~:text=Because%20the%20Queen%20spends%20most,the%20New%20Zealand%20prime%20minister.

Ah…

1 Like

But ether way the RNZAF head is the New Zealand government and the head of the Government is the King and he is also our head of state.

So yea RNZAF F-16 please

I am surprised they didnt take that option. I guess they just wanted to avoid giving every nation an F-16 and chose the nations they liked first.

1 Like

Mhm yea I’m surprised there are NZ serial numbers for these still logged and public avaliable.

http://www.adf-serials.com.au/nz-serials/nzf-16.htm

We’ll be on part 3 by tomorrow thats crazy

1 Like

Thats the plan with me RNZAF F-16 :D

1 Like

thats true, the first nation to recive the spike was italy, and no israel which is the country that produce the Missile, atleast put the missile at the same time in various nations israel, germany and italy, now gaijin is going to give 2 news helis to france and italy with the Spike ER and the israeli helis could carry the spike ER too, the question is, gaijin going to put the Spike ER in the israeli helis??

A4-AR FightingHawk from the Argentinean Air Force. (Grupo 5 de Caza)

1 Like

@Smin1080p i feel I might already know the answer to this one but hey you never know.

It’s a bit weird to me the MiG-25 isn’t in the game yet considering it’s pretty legendary so, is there any consideration about adding that beauty to the game anytime soon?

Or even better, the MiG-31

2 Likes

Coming soon hopefully, though I feel it will be hilariously bad in-game (especially MiG-25)

The thing has 0 dogfighting capability, R-40s have bad range compared to its western contemporaries (AIM-47 and 54)

It’s only advantage is going to be speed. But it would have to be placed at > 11.0 meaning that it will be stuck fighting 7F and Aim 54. Maybe R40T would be pretty good but idk enough about it’s seeker to know for sure

Again it would be a similar story with an early MiG-31 which gets outranged by AIM-54A and the PESA radar variant would have to be placed 12.0+ where it at best would be fighting F14D and again being outranged