It wouldn’t be the strangest nation to add, just not as good as some others.
i was about to get very mad about the search zone
but it seems were fine, dont get fooled by it boys
Nope, they aren’t there
Gaijin add AIM-7M Sparrow on F-16C Block 50 is temporary til AIM-120B & AIM-120C-3 AMRAAM replacment AIM-7M in 2 month
F-16C Block 50 fitted AN/APG-68(V)7 radar and not AESA radar, USAF upgraded F-16C Block 40/42 & F-16C Block 50/52 to F-16V Block 70/72 standard with AN/APG-83 Scalable Agile Beam Radar (SABR) AESA radar
I guess in the future dev could add F-16CM with AN/APG-68(V)9 radar and F-16V AN/APG-83 Scalable Agile Beam Radar (SABR) AESA radar located under F-16C Block 50
I hope gaijin consider AGM-65G & AGM-65K Maverick replacement AGM-65D and GBU-31(V)1/B JDAM in december
1 Like
im just surprised we dont have the laser mav yet
The F-16C Block 50 also gets Sparrows that it never mounted (and probably couldnt have used with the proper radar)
Sparrows can be used by F-16C blk.50/52s, as seen by Iraqi F-16C blk.52s that don’t have access to AIM-120, only AIM-7. AIM-7s should be mountable provided the correct pylons are attached as AIM-7s since the F model can apparently be guided with a PD radar that doesn’t have a CW illuminator, but given the US moved on to the AIM-120, it makes sense that no US F-16C blk.50s have mounted AIM-7s, whilst still retaining the option should they need to.
and is lacking the AESA radar that apparently all C variants from that block should have had.
AN/APG-80 is mounted on blk.60s for the UAE. AN/APG-83 is available as an upgrade for blk.40 and blk.50 aircraft, so it’s correct to not have it in game as it wasn’t installed when the aircraft was delivered.
1 Like
I guess our current F-16C Block 50 is the mid-life variant while future F-16C Block 50 late might add late AIM-120, AIM-9X, A2G munitions and AESA radar.
Just a thought idk
What do people here think of the Flanders map?
Personally I really like the design for it, and with Remembrance Day just around the corner (November 11th), I really appreciate how Gaijin made a map where the location is more known for WW1, and all I can think of when i see the map is “In Flander’s Fields” by John McCrae.
Overall im looking towards the addition of this map
2 Likes
u didnt use the forum enough yet/ you do not have those rights/ priviliges yet
Ive been able to make individual comments/posts for a while, managed to do it back in early September if i recall
still to low of an activity
Spain should be with italy via the “minor axis” rule.
stupid Flanders
1 Like
here’s a issue, JH7A use WS9 as the engine but not the WP13, i think this is gaijin’s problem, they r a little lazy
1 Like
Define “minor axis”
What’s the capability of JH-7A? We talkin F-16C standard? ARH missile capable?
JFC the entitlement… It’s using placeholder data from the J8F, as it’s obviously WIP.
4 Likes
Imo, likely different than what other people have to say, i find theres a couple of nations that would be able to have various other nations for them.
Examples:
Italy being the “minor axis tree” meaning it’ll have nations like Hungary, Romania, Bulgaria, and such.
Britain being the “commonwealth tree” having nations like South-Africa, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, etc.
And then Sweden being the “Northern Countries tree” (I cant remember the name) but having nations such as Finland, Norway, and likely Denmark, and others.
This is just what i think personally.
1 Like
nahz that pretty much owrk in progress stuff in general, and either way i dont see that vehicle coming this patch in the current state
1 Like
Fascist country allied with Germany. Only took part in a limited sense in WW2 via the government sponsored “Blue Division” which took part in the fighting around Leningrad. The nationalist side of the spanish civil war (the beta test for ww2), which would become the spanish state, began as basically an italian puppet faction.