Lmao that’s up to debate
AIM-120 AMRAAMS, F-15, F-18 Hornet, SEP V2/V3, AH-64E, AGM HELLFIRE L is coming soon.
.
1 Like
Like I said you are extremely biased. I have seen single nation mains who were more reasonable.
And to answer your earlier question, no. Because I have 5 nations up to top tier and I’m far more excited for rank VIII ground.
Huh?
M1A2 SEP and M1A1 AIM are missing their historically proven improved armor, M1A1 AIM is missing KEW-A2, all of U.S’ Top BR MBTs have the same hull armor as the baseline 1979, 10.3 M1 because they refuse to listen to the bug reports that indicate improved hull protection, all Abrams tanks are missing the 38mm reinforced upper fuel tank armor plates, all Abrams have 50mm thick turret rings despite being measured around 290mm LOS both ingame and in real life…
3 Likes
Well… In air maybe. In Ground and naval its still heavily soviet bias.
12.3s were a mistake. No doubt about it. But just bare in mind. That when someone moans about top tier balance or OP jets, They arent necessarily a US main. Im a Britain main. We have been royally screwed over the past year. I think its fair to moan about almost all other nations at this point. Does piss me off when both F-16C players AND Mig-29SMT players moan about needing buffs
3 Likes
Imagine getting you’re 20th MBT and the US get’s one good one after 4 then your the victim.
I don’t play top tier and even I know you’re on some kind of issue.
1 Like
Aim-120 yes, others im not sure. Maybe. I do think they need to jump all nations ahead that would include F-15 to recreate balance
What inside information do you have that confirms that?
And how about German Buff Leopard tanks and RU MBTs?
The US doesn’t need more Abrams for the next update, they have the most MBTs than any other nation
1 Like
Seriously ? Ok then I will count the trees and see where you got that from.
And I know you are already wrong
They can surprisingly add F-15 to the game like they did with F16C
1 Like
You didn’t just say that Russia ground needs a buff at top tier and also that US has the most MBTs at top tier, when Russia has more.
Lmao. Hilarious.
2 Likes
7 Abrams
15 T series MBT
4 Likes
It came to him in a dream.
Just trust him bro (/s)
Even if that were the case- so what?
Russia can have 6x tanks with 650 KE hull armor and one (soon to be two) with 720mm KE hull armor… yet U.S is limited to having 360 miserable mm of hull armor?
And what about the number? Even if Russia only had 6 and U.S had 50, it wouldn’t change a thing- it’s not like you spawn a dozen MBTs every match. Most lineups have 3-4 MBTs.
You are counting U.S by having “more MBTs” because you are counting even 10.3s and 11.0s that don’t have any kind of armor even on the turret cheeks. No wonder!
2 Likes
I i tend to main sweeden and we have partialy gotten the same treatment
Why does US have more battle tanks than Russia? Are you seriously playing 10.0 BR RU MBTs in the top tier?
The USA has more main battle tanks in the tech tree + squadron than Russia:
M1A1
IPM1
M1A1 HC
M1A1 AIM
M1A2
M1A2 SEP
Russia:
T-90A (obsolete)
T-72B3 (obsolete)
T-80U (obsolete)
T-80UK (obsolete)
T-80BVM
.
2 Likes
Sweden air is the only other nation I have any sympathy for currently as whilst they are in a slightly better position in some regards. its not by much.
sadly
The fact that you count M1A1 and IPM1 is hilarious. Those things don’t even have any kind of turret armor at 11.7.
If you want to count M1A1 and IPM1, then we need to count T-80B and T-72B (1989) for Russia too.
And again: what lineup on EARTH have you ever seen with 6x MBTs, specially when 2 of them are entirely obsolete?
1 Like