What’s wrong with the COEP on PUMA VJTF?
This is not even the second version of MUSS 2.0, the question is, what is it, clearly some kind of new anti-ATGM protection system!
3 Likes
WT Mobile keeps up it 's lead on the Naval side, specially w/ GB announcements this time ( [Coming Soon] Allied Naval Vehicles - War Thunder Mobile - Online Military Action Game - Play for Free ):
The battleship HMS Vanguard, last to enter service w/ the RN and last battleship ever put into service
Had been in the files before WTM 's last major update, along w/ Yamato and Bismarck. Given the name of this devblog( Allied Naval Vehicles ) and the expansion into other kinds of naval vessels we’ve seen Mobile begin and/or lay the groundwork for, those two will probably be announced soon as being the last end-of-line battleships that game will see.
AS you will recall, last year Bvvd stated in an interview ( https://www.4gamer.net/games/216/G021602/20221207023/ ) that Yamato was still planned for WT, but would be implemented to WT Mobile first. W/ real indications that that will be in the next few weeks, and the unusual ( lack of ) end-of-line Bluewater additions that were part of the Rank 6 expansion here, it 's not improbable that this will be in the near future.
The submarine HMS Vampire(P72)
We found evidence that british submarines would be coming to WT long before WT:E/WTM was announced - which makes it especially unusual that the first one to be announced coming there carries none of that evidence.
The ROQF 4in Mk.XXIII deck gun( used by Amphion-class ) and Type M Mk.2 tube-launched mine( used by T, S(later), and Grampus classe ) have been in the files for years, but neither were employed by the V-class which Vampire belongs to.
( https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/lj0oy4/currently_unused_vehicles_loadouts_and_weaponry/, https://gszabi99.github.io/#naval_guns1 )
4 Likes
It’s hidden in the article.
But, since the “MUSS” hasn’t been properly integrated into the game, I don’t think Gaijin will bring a cougar with the device.
That would be a nightmare for everything that has guided weapons and the Puma would be everyone’s best friend.
1 Like
What are you guys even talking about ?
Hmm I wonder if this update will introduce new jump of BBs like Bismarck, KGV, Nagato, Colorado?
1 Like
It would certainly make some kind of sense over how the last update went ! Though I’m not sure of the likelihood of the USN tt jumping past the leaked USS Mississippi, assuming it 's the later one.
Guess we’ll find out soon.
1 Like
uh… no
What is he trying to push here I’ve not been paying attention
what the hell is that thing tho
what in the world is that
That’s ridiculous…
Update this Sunday 1000%. Plus negative interest rate 101% discounts.
All jokes aside I’m expecting dev blog this Thurs/Fri. I know the December update is veeeery steady but correct me if I am wrong, the November one tends to be fairly steady too.
1 Like
Where did you see that decal?
Usually the October/November one is average, so not big nor small, with the December one being the biggest or one of.
Datamine for version 2.29.0.91
( https://www.reddit.com/r/Warthunder/comments/173qiw1/datamine_229090_229091/ )
1 Like
Ahh, for US Naval Day
1 Like
I meant steady in release date, not referring to content size.
It’s ok if it’s small though, the side additions get me hyped more than the main additions usually.
hey VJTF is a NATO force and it switches leadership regularly
That dude said that Germany should have all those nation in it’s branch.
I mean it’s not suprising, because he is a bit special in that regard, but I gotta side with the benelux tree fanboy here.
2 Likes
Ah, I see.
that’s an akeron mp tho
the lp variant could come to the HAD as well I guess, but only if they allow “test firing”, pretty sure it will get into service sooner or later anyway
not balanced by any means tho since it’s NLOS
They could make it fire and forget like spike on the italian vehicle (freccia was it ?).
Still would be unbalanced, not expecting them anytime soon.
the only downside of those is their slow speed (160m/s, roughly 580 kph)
EDIT : nvm didn’t see you meant to say Pars 3LR and not spike 3LR
1 Like