I think that was the point. A nation with 98 bad vehicles that no one plays and 2 good vehicles that everyone plays is necessarily a stronger or better nations than one with 10 okay vehicles that some people play and 2 good vehicles everyone plays
There is a difference between having an opinion and trolling.
XP-50 BR is not nerfed yet, A-10 with AIM-9L is still not nerfed to 11.0, A-6E aswell
M1A1 AIM not moved up to 11.7
F-14A Early not moved up to 12.3, F-14B to 13.0 & F-16C aswell
And we all have opinions against soviet vehicles too. Just because other people have different opinions to your own doesn’t make our opinions invalid.
Personally I play SB as Britain, I rarely If ever fight US and so I do have a biased perspective and thus biased opinion about fighting soviet. But that doesn’t make those objection untrue
2 Likes
It’s not about being right or wrong for me.
I just find it concerning that you’ve performed the equivalent of yelling at your monitor to deaf ears for several hours now.
Your efforts yield no results, might as well spend your hours better at that point
Su25 with R60M not nerfed yet
S238 not nerfed yet
Ka50 not nerfed yet
T72 TURMS not nerfed yet
T-80BVM not fixed yet
Mig-29 to Br13 when?
For every US vehicle you moan about there is probably a soviet one also too moan about
3 Likes
Uh, I normally write posts about problems that exist xD
All I want is for every vehicle to be depicted accurately; I want SEP and AIM to get their correct armor values, the same way I want Leclercs, Arietes and Merkavas to do so as well; and the same way I was the first player to bring out the issues with T-64A’s underperforming armor, ballistics and poor balance against the XYZ-70s back when it was released in 1.71 (2017) and when I, “U.S main and Russian hater” according to you, was a Russian main, being Russia among the first Top Tier nations I grinded and one of the most played nations by me.
I also talked about the M1 balance issue when it was actually OP (2018) and Russia ACTUALLY suffered for a while, particularly against U.S, when all it had to counter M1 and later IPM1 were T-64A and T-64B- I even deemed T-80B not to be sufficient back then, asking for BV with improved armor layout and T-72B as well- so yes, I have advocated for Russia when it was actually needed, and I’ve called U.S OP when it has actually OP. (Other instances of me supporting Russian vehicles include back when I attempted to have T-90A’s turret traverse speed buffed as according to my understanding of its stabilizer’s specifications).
Anyway, that’s my last reply on this waste of time xD I took my sweet time and effort to try to take you seriously for a second, which is more than you deserve, so I hope you appreciate it!
EDIT: here’s my topic attempting to improve T-90A’s turret rotation speed. Is this the kind of post a “Russophobic U.S main” would do to you? T-90A wrong turret rotation speed (underperforming) - General & Upcoming - War Thunder - Official Forum
EDIT 2: look, more posts a “Russophobic U.S main” would do! Not only talking about the ingame vehicles, their issues and balance: but also about Russian tanks in real life:
7 Likes
I fully expect F-4F ICE purely from the fact that AV-8B+ came before AV-8BNA.
@Morvran
Ka-50 has been nerfed 3 times, and sits at 11.0, where it shares a BR with the superior helicopter Rooivalk until the next BR change where Rooivalk finally goes above it.
T-72A TURMS has rather weak armor, that’s its “nerf”.
2S38 is nerfed from the fact it doesn’t have a search radar.
Lineup plays a huge role aswell. For example Germany at 4.3 has tanks like jagdpanzer4, hetzer, stug3 G and sturer emil (maybe ostwind or wirbelwind aswell). The first 3 are great but all have no turret and are tank destroyers.
You need a mix of tanks aswell
That’s why I am quite passionate about a rank 3 light tank for germany.
Ka50 has no thermal and its fine
Whats S238?
su25 with r60m is fine, you can just dodge unlike aim9l but if you dont like it, replace with normal r60 then
mig29 flight model was nerfed hard few days ago
turms has t72a armor with k1 era and its still mid
did they remove thermals from KA50?
and no Su 25 at that BR is NOT fine you got planes like F-86 meeting it that have literally no chance
1 Like
never had them
ka50 never got thermal in game since release
To be fair with their short ranged R-60M SU-25 is less of an issue.
KA-50/52 are far from what they once were.
Turms and ZTZ are 10.0 for quite some time now.
Both are easily destroyed as well and generally only have a slight advantage in spotting.
2S38 is dangerous but I would not say op.
Sure Puma in comparison is handicapped but that is a different matter.
1 Like
Ka50 has the most OP agms in game and has a broken damage model. Should be 11.3 now all other premium helis are going up
2S38 the 2024 IFV/SPAA thing that is at 10.0 and should be 10.7/11
Su25 still has all aspect at a BR where a lot of jets don’t have CMs
TURMS is still almost immortal when fighting something like Chally DS especially with it missing L26 shells
→ op atgm on ka50, do you have it and have you ever used it in RB?
vikhir is the most assblasted op atgm in the game
2 Likes
I’ve been sniped at 10km by one many times. Not too mention seen them tank hit after hit. Vikhrs are still superior to Hellfires
Heck, heli PvP mode was deleted almost exclusively because of the Ka50
Man, i seem to habe missed all the fun again, and yes some people over do it with main nation contribution, would gonsider myself one of the more reasonable german ones