Literally all we’ve asked for is decisive evidence of existence beyond the mockup stage, and KH-38MT apologists have continued to post the same erroneous evidence, the same inaccurate images and the same cope phrase of ‘it’s a modular system so it must work’, if, and when you can cough up a real source of it’s existence, then the debate is settled, however in over a year of existence in game, none have surfaced, rather curious no?
2 Likes
Its not pretty clear XD
KH-38M doesn’t have a MMW option and GNSS seeker doesn’t even need a lens.
How did you figure that out?
And what are those parts?
1 Like
Check the thread that has been locked, it’s all explained there.
Quote this explanation.
1 Like
I did already.
KH-38M doesn’t have a MMW option
And yet… the photo has a board describing a AESA seeker.
It’s almost like they advertise stuff they doesn’t exist. Just like the 38MT
3 Likes
yes it is pretty clear that it is a fake seeker made for a mockup missile
Do you guys think our lovely community managers
@Smin1080p_WT or @Stona_WT will ever acknowledge any of the feedback regarding this munition and its existence? Or that if any negative feedback about it has been passed along to the developers?
or
Will they continue being silent about it like usual?
Quite pathetic that they step around this topic on a daily basis. They’ll give the usual PR answer of ‘If we had anything to say we would say it’ like they do with every thing else.
It’s pretty much a prototype IR seeker.
really? what sources do you have for that claim
Hey. We have said many times in multiple topics we are always passing on constructive feedback on all subjects across the community. Firing off personal insults however sadly doesn’t leave us with anything to pass on.
Constructive feedback and reports supported by evidence are always welcome, and we will always forward all of those and provide any answers we receive back.
1 Like
Competent guy that looked into the closeup images of the seeker, it’s not rocket science ?
Thanks for the response.
so the mockup seeker looks like a seeker? is that all the “proof” you have
Just a general question, how do we structure a report about a lack of evidence for a certain outcome?
Would we prepare counter-evidence so to speak, and just compile sources that disprove the claim/weapon in question?
1 Like
So we can assume that Gaijin in some capacity know about the displeasure regarding the KH38MT and just refuse any statement whatsoever?
2 Likes
That’s a huge part of the problem.
There is nothing that can be done to correct this situation.
The single source of data about the proposed seeker gives specs which are extremely far below how it is currently implemented. The problem is, that single source of information is a marketing brochure and isn’t a good enough source.
So we’re in a situation where gaijin voilated their own policies and rules, then gave said violation specs so far outside of reality it would make pravda blush and then refuses to correct it because the single source of information isn’t a good enough.
The result is Kafkaesque, a contradiction built into the system itself, and frankly absurd.
6 Likes
I think its time to make a compilation thread of the hypocrisy, and double standards over the years.