thats how it should be. want a lot of kills? gotta try really hard. shouldnt be easy.
Yeah… Though the short range nature of them can be fixed by replacing them with Brimstone 2s (Which the Typhoons should have not the 1s) and the warheads being a little hit and miss is an issue with all AGMs aiming for centre mass, with the overhauls to how FnF weapons hit naval targets, I wonder if something similar could work with tanks
Not that I recall seeing, or at least remember seeing
Yep, except for the fact that the su30/34 can just click 6 times to get similar or better results.
No one would have any problems with keeping laser lock if everybody else had balanced CAS too
1 Like
Do all of us a favor, type “KH-38” into the forum search bar and use any one of those numerous threads. We don’t need another cope post every 15 seconds.
1 Like
regardless the way it is worded "we will move towards heavier systems including several chassis … " seems like it is definetly confirmed while the way of controlling these vehicles is what they are having thoughts on, the implementation
confirmed being added
unconfirmed of how their control will be implemented
This would be likely the only way. I’d also like if this small ground map concept might be entirely abandoned. One reason Suchoi CAS is so hyper op is simply the fact that all vehicles are locked inside a tiny ground area, which is easy to observe with a thermal target pod. Its like one view angle and you know where everyone is. Especially AA units are easily taken out this way. Imagine you simply might drive away from the objectives and position youself in the hinterland. Whereever you like on the [full] map.
1 Like
Yeah, thats big warhead vs tiny warhead problems.
KH-38 has a warhead 3x that of an AGM-65 and AGM-65 can sometimes not kill.
Brimstone is 1/5th the size of an AGM-65. So no wonder that centre mass hits dont always kill. Though i do also think the Tandem warhead on the brimstone/soviet ERA vs tandem charges isnt right
Im not worried about if they are added. At this point, they really odnt have any other choice.
My main concern is when, and who.
There are certainly options for some better SPAA than what we’ve already got that doesnt necessarily require multi vehicle platforms. But none have come. Leaving nations like Israel and Italy with basically nothing at top tier and US, Britain and Japan with pretty weak options.
with Pantsir added 3 years ago now, that is rather annoying
something something
(example)
maybe some nations will receive older multi vehicle sams and israel receiving significantly more potent single vehicle sam
or both
or something else.
Im guessing soviets will get something first, probably followed by Germany and the US. Leaving the other 7 nations waiting for the next 1-3 major updates to get equivalents.
1 Like
bloodhound for uk would be great.
after 2 years of waiting
Everytime US gets something new, Israel gets the same thing or slightly worse version.
good thing what israel could have is not used by US this time
Like what? I mean they got spikes on their AH60 while US version still use the old and slow Hellfires.
Or the SL-ASRAAM Supacat or Sky Sabre
2 Likes
That’s some sexy looking vehicle, we can share though.
wonder when we are getting tanks with APS (with this i mean, top tier aps for majority of countries). It is already past the time of needing it to deal with things like kh-38.