KH-38 needs to be nerfed or removed. GRB is unplayable

[Ion_Protogen]

@ItsOnyy

CAS in this game needs to be treated like a killstreak, something you can only spawn because you earned it.

It already is like that now, but the barrier to earn it is way to low,

@ItsOnyy

All of these except airfield spawn, it will make aircraft less predictable to spot, but I get you don’t want pilots spotting people right away either, it’s a tradeoff, but I’m no sure how it could help once a plane is airborne.

I mostly suggested that because it will help immensely with nerfing CAS at lower BRs, but I can see how it might be a worse option at top tier.

[S-200VE_Vega]

again all cas talk that does not take into account that multi vehicle sam systems are coming.

[Chubbmaster]

I think you yourself mentioned this before but maybe it was someone else, but I really liked the idea of itemized SP cost that they mentioned.
Like each IR AGM would have a individual SP cost and it’d be higher based on the amount of AGM

Hot take, have the Brimstone be IR FnF and make SP cost itemized. You could take like 4 or so for the current sp cost for 18 and make it like 2400sp to carry full 12-18 brimstone lol. Because I think that’d be hilarious and balanced for you to need almost a nuke’s worth of sp to spawn a Eurofighter with full brimstone

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Chubbmaster

Hot take, have the Brimstone be IR FnF

no it will make more cancer for tank rb

[Chubbmaster]

IIRC they said they were “looking into it” or something like that, but I hope it is

[S-200VE_Vega]

pretty sure i saw a full confirmation on it, maybe from smin

[Chubbmaster]

Did you read the rest of my post?
I think it would be quite balanced to spawn that loadout for the cost of a nuke TBH

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Chubbmaster

I think it would be quite balanced to spawn that loadout for the cost of a nuke TBH

it is pointless then. they can just nuke.

[Chubbmaster]

Really? i’ll look for it, multi vehicle SPAA are something I’ve been looking forward to for a while

[Chubbmaster]

Yeah maybe not the full cost, maybe like 2400. But then again, I would honestly take that over a nuke

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Chubbmaster

Really? i’ll look for it, multi vehicle SPAA are something I’ve been looking forward to for a while

i cant promise 100% but i thought they said it was coming. either it is a problem with what i remember, or i remember correctly.

[Morvran]

Just have 6x Brimstone equal the SP cost of any other FnF AGM. And then have the SP cost increase for each extra hardpoint you take, with the full 18 costing around the 2000 SP mark.

That way the quantity advantage is mitigated heavily, but you dont end up with stupid things like only being able to take 6x FnFs in all gamemodes.

Could also be used to balance KH-38s with each 2 taken increasing the cost slightly.

[Thodin]

@Chubbmaster

Really? i’ll look for it, multi vehicle SPAA are something I’ve been looking forward to for a while

Im just thinking how to deploy a multi vehicle Patriot System on on a typical GRB map. Like Facotry^^ Lets be realistic, the maps are too small and even if its a bigger one, it will be difficult to deploy this without getting sniped by MBTs. A truck like Flarak Rad is already hard to hide and tanks permanently try to sniper your radar dish.

[S-200VE_Vega]

maybe added in some other point of map and destroyable only by planes or helis

[Morvran]

@magazine2

Q: In Ground Realistic Battles, top attack aircraft are capable of dominating ground vehicles for the most part. Are there any plans to do something about this in 2025?
A: According to our data, the balance at the top ranks of ground battles is noticeably shifted towards aviation and helicopters, and this balance has become even worse with the introduction of top aircraft this year. The situation where aircraft can attack tanks from a safe distance with impunity makes gameplay more boring for aviation and less fair for ground vehicles, a similar situation is with helicopters equipped with long-range fast ATGMs, or “fire-and-forget” ATGMs.

To counter these types of threats, more powerful systems are needed that have the ability to fire at several targets at once and a wide search sector in both azimuth and elevation. The most advanced SAM system currently presented in the game only partially meets these requirements, so we’ll move towards heavier systems for all nations, including those components of which are located on several chassis. Of course, we’ll have to solve the problem of controlling these types of SAM systems, but we’re already having thoughts on the matter.

In turn, there are plans to add new capabilities for aircraft. And while we do not consider anti-radiation missiles (ARM) a priority and necessity, more advanced capabilities of ESM from on board an aircraft, i.e. more accurate determination of the active radar position, are in our fairly close plans.

It was here

[Chubbmaster]

Yeah I agree with this except for the fact that the brimstone is quite bad at the moment, you CAN get a high number of kills if you try really hard though

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Morvran_

It was here

i remember someone else having screenshotted a smaller text where it was "more"confirmed
could also have been someone bullsh*tting.

[S-200VE_Vega]

@Chubbmaster

you CAN get a high number of kills if you try really hard though

thats how it should be. want a lot of kills? gotta try really hard. shouldnt be easy.

[Morvran]

Yeah… Though the short range nature of them can be fixed by replacing them with Brimstone 2s (Which the Typhoons should have not the 1s) and the warheads being a little hit and miss is an issue with all AGMs aiming for centre mass, with the overhauls to how FnF weapons hit naval targets, I wonder if something similar could work with tanks

[Morvran]

Not that I recall seeing, or at least remember seeing