for one maybe fixing how broken saclos guidance is and adding some of the realistic capability top tier spaas are missing is a good start
2 Likes
Looks absolutely impressive until you learn they’re going against lvl 30s with 0.2 K/D and people that actually spawn 750 SP drones in a top tier game lmao.
Hopefully none
Dude I had a game that I was finally able to launch all 6 at the enemy’s… all of them did not kill additional they don’t have the effective range of a KH-38MT or the Hammer.
It’s almost like the soviet union had to make air defense becuase of western air superiority. I wouldn’t mine this employed in the game, something like russia gets some better air defense but weaker/less effective ATG weapons were western nations could get older systems but with stronger ATG weapons. Adding proper doctrines in the game could be really cool.
The Pantsir S1 is from the mid '90s, Tor-M1 is from the late '80s… And that isn’t even in the Soviet tree, China gets it exclusively!
Most countries consider self-propelled highly mobile anti-air to be… Obsolete, stationary sites?
Are you joking?
How so?
Who asked? Use your “western air superiority” to deny some Kh-38s if it’s such a problem.
the main modernization would be pantsi s1m, there are better newer systems, some have been upgraded in decent numbers but thing like pantsir SM have not, Tor has been upgraded once. chinese systems are different from russian systems, and they by far rely significantly less on mobile anti air systems compared to russia, as they actually have a competent air force.
we’ve had this argument already, spaas have been left behind by most nato countries for a reason, stationary sites can do the defensive job better, and aircraft can do to the offensive part better, hell we’ve seen ukraine use patriot offensively to decent effect too. im not getting in another argument about this here you clearly dont agree.
why are we still in this “new vs old” non sense
it doesn’t matter. capabilities matter.
kh38mt is both newer and more capable than most other AGM’s ingame, aasm 250 is slightly older than kh38mt but still way too strong imo. i just dont see why these weapons needed to be added.
which doesnt matter
which matters
because if it was newer and less capable it would be no problem
age does not matter. age never has mattered. it is pointless to mention it
it makes sense to mention it in a discussion about a weapons capabilities, not really in a discussion about its place in the game, like r77-1 shows its all about wether a weapon would be balanced ingame. aasm250 and kh38mt even after the cost increase arent balanced
it isn’t a factor in this game
no it does not. it only tells age. capabilities tell where it should be balanced
re read what i said please
age isn’t a factor. pointless to try to use it to strengthen an argument
smh
I like Cold War era stuff - Amx-30s, Leo 1s, M60s… its still not top tier regarding capabilities, although there are a few outliers. I think the game is best around 8.0ish (7.7-9.0 to be more exact)… lots of fun in there, with some unusual stuff thrown into it too. CAS/Helis are not as OP as in the higher BRs, and they can be counter-played, but a good CAS player could make a difference in these BRs (but still necessarily winning the game).
Alas, personal opinion/preference. Not going to try to convert anyone. I understand people who enjoy even lower tiers; Im personally not a fan of all the WW2 stuff.
1 Like
if you dont think AAs are underpreforming look at the thread about how much gaijin has messed up the ADATS
Did I ever once state that AAs aren’t underperforming?
you asked “How so?” so I mentioned somewhere you can find out