Updated, linked to another thread. You can check the exact updates there.
I recommend adding your sources and photos to already existing report here:
[DEV] The front landing gear on the JAS 39E is extended too far.
1 Like
will gripen E recive better missles ? cuz i think for a top tier fighter aim120a (rb99) is not good
this will be rejected, not enough info
How exactly does the sensor fusion work on this?
for now 13.7 with rb99
similar with Rafale
it wont stay 13.7 we all know this
its just photos but i can
1 Like
yes its real don’t think they have ever been used but I could be wrong
Will the JAS-39E Gripen have the Targo II HMD? And if so, will it have datalink capability?Sorry for the question, it may have already been answered, but there are so many comments.
Sadly parasite drag from ordinance (and pylons) is basically nonexistent in game and gripen A/C is the biggest benifiter of that already
Judging from the current performance of the test server, the Gripen E still needs a buff
3 Likes
MAWs and RWR linked to countermeasures, thats about it
in what?
missing the ability to carry air to ground munitions on the belly pylons- [DEV] JAS39E is unable to carry bombs on belly pylons // Gaijin.net // Issues
2 Likes
yeah, that’s belly pylons bugging should be possible to bring paveway bombs (2) and JAS39E should be able to bring 6 AGM65G or F.
It should have slightly larger wings (3% or about 1m^2) more. Currently, even though the model itself is slightly larger, that’s not actually modeled with its flight model, which is identical to the C minus higher weight and more thrust.
This would give it a better sustained turn rate and reduce its wing loading to be in line with the prior C model.
2 Likes
ok? but its missing almost a ton of weight
so its fm is still overpreforming
1 Like