@N9197U list of reports here
I have redone the 9L one as the tech mod who did it is illiterate
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/TiRqJ6y08oCF
“The 1999 Ja37D manual states RB74 as an option meaning it carried on using IR missiles which are upgraded 9Ls” > The 1999 Ja37D manual states RB74 as an option meaning it carried on using IR missiles which are 9Ls upgraded with IRCCM
Did anything get changed from dev to live, did JA37D’s cockpit get corrected? Did any Di skin get adjusted?
Nothing has changed for the JA37’s they are still inaccurate as can be. Im waiting for my engine bug report to be accepted so i can see how they continue to mess up the Viggens.
JA37Di received datalink.
Did it? The radar doesn’t say it even has Datalink. Had a few buds asking if the JA37Di was worth buying as a TT grinder and i said to just wait for this garbage pile to go on sale. Eh, 13.0 with ARH being the only useful trait imo isnt worth a 400kn purchase imo.
Its not in x-ray view but it has 4 DL channels in battle with time to hit info and everything.
Eh, ill wait till the rest of the vehicle is fixed. (Like thats gonna happen) Its not even worth touching in its current state as it stands.
What if no DL = unlimited DL?
no, usually means none
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/oxRneNOWk9LF
Updated to accepted so heres hoping we see a change soon to the viggens. Fingers crossed for the engine temp, speed, and max altitude on them.
1 Like
Developer’s response:
we don’t adjust high altitudes exact: game atmosphere has no tropopause region. any aircraft is slightly underperforming at very high altitude. It will be tuned to able to achieve ~M1.6 with 50% fuel load.
for AJ-37 and AJS-37 max speed limit will be reduced according FPL to 1350km/h (JA-37 has M1.2 at SL will not be changed).
temperatures and times will be adjusted too
Huge rip to the AJ family so they imo are now dead since without speed at SL they are useless.
i’ll look at this later to fact check, what source did you use and where can i find it in a manual for the AJ or AJS
This is so stupid. This is only based off the fact the SFI del 3 cuts the chart off at mach 1.1 (1358). If you observe both graphs you can see that both the AJ37 and JA37 keep the same accelleration to 1.1, with the only difference being that the JA37 chart actually extends to mach 1.2.
If they had included the 1.2 range on the AJ37 manual the performance chart would’ve likely been identical.
for sources look up:
SFI FPL AJ 37 del 3 (kap. 11 sid. 9) (declassified)
SFI FPL JA37 del 4 (kap.2 sid. 8) (declassified)
If the true airframe limit would be 1.1 this would’ve likely been brought up in the manual. The reason this is non debatable is because there was no airframe strengthening between the AJ37 and JA37 when it comes to high speed tolerance, strengthening was only done in regards to high speed handling.
The chart indicates that the engine is not being bottlenecked past mach 1.1.
Only by mach 1.2 on the JA37 do we start to see a significant drop in acceleration.
2 Likes
Id make another bug report on it then
on something they haven’t yet changed?
Yeah you could change their mind or alter it
1 Like