Well, it’s a pity for chinese mains in wt. everything has a tradeoff.
“A man of character conceals his blade within, waiting for the opportune moment to act. He presents a blunt edge to the world, while keeping the sharpness for his own discipline.”
3 Likes
Forcing the Russians to admit that China’s J-15 and J-16 Flanker series fighters are more advanced and powerful than their original versions would be even more distressing to them than killing their own mothers (whether it’s the naval or air force version)
10 Likes
J-15T should be at 14.3 br if there was no buff on its performance. It’s obviously worse than the other jets at 14.7 and couldn’t even surpass the F15CGE which is at 14.3.
J-15T is however notably better than F-18E.
J-15 is also better than anything Russia could muster for naval aircraft in-game.
F-18E is at 14.3 and the “anything Russia could muster for naval aircraft in game” were also not at 14.0+
Same with the USN and USAF I fully support integrated ECM capabilities
1 Like
The F-15GE is also significantly better than the F-18E, but it is at 14.3
I’m not entirely sure what you’re trying to say. At BR 14.3, there are the F-15C GE, JAS 39E, Su-30SM/MKM, and old Eurofighter —it’s not just the F-18E.If you believe the J-15T is stronger than the F-18E and therefore shouldn’t be at BR 14.3, then all the jets mentioned above should be at BR 14.7 as well, shouldn’t they?
And the F-18E’s performance is not that lackluster. While its top speed is lower, its engine’s power generation is excellent, allowing it to quickly recover from energy loss during maneuvers. Additionally, it carries more missiles than the F-15C GE.
Moreover, the Russian naval aircraft in the game are low-tier jets at 13.0. And you might not realize that the Su-30SM2 in the game actually carries a Russian Naval Aviation livery, meaning that, in a sense, it is also a Russian naval aircraft.
1 Like
SM2 ? we gonna ignore that this flanker exists ? still more than comparable to the J15T
1 Like
Gaijin, why are you pretending nothing is wrong? You keep pushing out new vehicles while completely ignoring the player experience.
Since the update went live, J-15T has been extremely frustrating to play. With only 48 countermeasures, it simply cannot function properly as a top-tier fighter. You were clearly aware of this issue—I’m certain you knew about the J-15’s limitations from the very beginning of development—yet you still released it anyway, without any meaningful fixes, and placed it at 14.7 to face much stronger aircraft. In fact, its performance is worse than the 14.3 F-15 Eagle (F-15GE). This shows a complete disregard for player experience. What exactly are you thinking?
You said that the performance of new vehicles would be monitored. By now, the J-15T’s poor performance should already be clearly reflected in the data. Are you just going to keep ignoring the problem?
3 Likes
It’s unbelievable that the J-15T still uses the exact same radar and RWR as the J-10C.Aren’t you willing to give it proper upgrades to match its 14.7 battle rating?Do you really enjoy deliberately downplaying Chinese aircraft?
3 Likes
Don’t say anything that puts the Russian Federation at a disadvantage! :)
😂😂
1 Like
Unfortunately information on both the J10C/J15T AESA are hard so come by😞. that’s why you must “take it with a pinch of salt”. Same goes for top rank tanks for all nations and most top their aircraft.
I don’t think that the j10c radar could fit in the j15t though unless it’s a smaller variant
1 Like
J10c radar is smaller than J-15t radar
I thought it was wider my b
1 Like
will the J15 possibly get more flares/Chaff?
It can’t only upgrade would be ECM when it gets introduced to the game
J15DT and DH both have ECM pod capabilities and are based on the T to begin with but information is scarce due to the fact of them being pretty new