it fake flanker what you expect?
1 Like
Tigertank, is this you?
1 Like
Are you serious? J-15T is the strongest batch in 14.3, what is it in 13.7? Is it an alien spacecraft?
2 Likes
StatShark
J-15T vs SM2 FM
Engine
Turn Rate
Time to speed ( sea level )
Time to speed ( 9000m )
Basic Info
2 Likes
Wait j15t doesnt have hmd ?
To be honest, in the game, missiles whose range increased from 80 km to 120 km, like the AIM-120C and R-77-1, have received significant upgrades in both propulsion and aerodynamics. We don’t deny that the PL-12 performs well within its tier as an 80 km-range missile. However, it is ultimately a lower-tier missile—its own propulsion and effective range are not impressive, and it can be carried by BR 13.0 aircraft.
Currently, the PL-12A in the game is essentially just an old missile with a completely new seeker—its in-game 3D model is entirely based on the PL-12AE. We don’t even know if this missile, which has no propulsion upgrades, exists in reality (its mass is still 198 kg), nor do we know if its mass will be changed to 214 kg, the same as the PL-12AE,At least the community manager considers the export variant of the PL-12A to be the PL-12AE.. on the live servers. If that’s the case, its performance in the live server will be even worse.
We don’t expect the new PL-12A to be as powerful in all aspects as the R-77-1. It could be like the AIM-120C, which offers not bad range for long-distance engagements but makes trade-offs in closer ones—this would at least allow it to be used in conjunction with the old PL-12.
At BR 14.7, what we face is, almost without exception, AIM-120C, AIM-120D, R-77-1, and MICA missiles. The J-15T doesn’t have many CM, and its performance is clearly not the best—it’s not a Rafale, which can maximize the performance of the MICA. The J-15T desperately needs a missile that is effective at long range without being excessively overpowered(not pl15). The PL-12A/AE seemed like an excellent choice—that’s what I thought before, because in the game, missiles with a 120 km range have shown very clear improvements. However, the appearance of the PL-12A and AIM-120D completely shattered my previous assumption—they only extend “range” by increasing seeker battery life… but what’s the point of the current in-game PL-12A?
Furthermore, its RWR has been a functional copy since the J-7E, differing only in name (the Su-30SM2’s 360°x90° RWR has already been approved). Its radar is a copy of the J-10C’s, with only the TWS Sea mode added.Its cockpit model is also incorrect .The pilot model is both new and old—a new flight suit paired with a very outdated, copied Soviet-style HMS flight helmet…
6 Likes
J-10C got TWS SEA if im not wrong
1 Like
Then its radar is still a complete clone of the KLJ-10A, with only the model being different, even though its model is a copy of the N011M. lol
It has a HMS, same as previous J-11B and all other Flankers, but no (J)HMCS like EF, Rafale and J-10C for example.
2 Likes
it’s a clone KLJ-10A even the name, just the 3d model is the N011M. Theres no report for the J-15T Radar model
No one knows what the radar on the J-15T is actually called in real life, nor what it looks like internally. But one thing is certain — the radome size of the Su-27 is considerably larger than the 700mm one on the J-10. Furthermore, the J-15T uses a tilted radar array similar to that on the J-11D, allowing for an even larger radar antenna area.However, in the game, its performance data is a complete copy of the KLJ-10A, with no increase in locking range.
5 Likes
they bought the prototype of the SU33 from ukraine
In 2001, the T-10K-3, an unfinished prototype of the Su-33,[7] was acquired by SAC from Ukraine[8] and is claimed to have been studied extensively and reverse-engineered, with development on the J-15 beginning immediately afterward
to low unless it gets more CMs it should be like 14.0 14.3
Plane.
1 Like
I don’t get what it is with manufacturers and air forces not taking countermeasure count seriously.
As I’ve said previously: 48 large caliber countermeasures isn’t enough to be comfy at top BR air.
A take I guarantee everyone agrees with; but sadly a manufacturer years ago didn’t anticipate a simulator to showcase that weakness.
Some basic common sense: Br 14.7 currently consists of the Su-30SM2, AESA Typhoon, and Rafale. When you say ‘not the only ones,’ are you seeing F-15EXs in your dreams?
Stop putting words in my mouth. I never said 48 is ‘great’—I said giving a 14.7 jet only 48 pops is a balance disaster. You’re calling it a ‘challenge’ just to sound brave,you’re just making excuses and singing praises for every single decision Gaijin makes, no matter how broken it is.
Tons of people love Chinese aircraft, but you’re definitely not one of them. You should focus on improving your skills instead of constantly playing the contrarian on the forums, my dear friend—especially when the first thing anyone sees on your profile of Statshark is a massive wall of orange.
4 Likes
it definitely deserves to go down to 14.3 but even then it’s still doa
I really hope we get expanded ECM/jamming capabilities so we can see things like J15DH/DT and F/A-18G
@庄方宜
I’ve been saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal this entire time.
Your posts claimed I am wrong for saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal.
Your posts are claiming it’s contrarian to say 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal/enough.
If that was not your intent, then amend your posts, cause your posts may disagree with your intent, and I think you and I actually agree that 48 isn’t enough.
It can’t be 14.3 because the inferior F-18E is 14.3 though.
Also when all you have is statshaming because I play bombers and stock aircraft as well, you’re admitting we’re correct for saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal/enough.
And I can’t blame Gaijin for a decision an aircrraft manufacturer made; Gaijin didn’t design and produce the J-15T.
1 Like
Its tough to balance because top tier air is still compressed. Right now there is just no way J15-T can get more CM. If it didn’t get access to P12A then we could move it down but unfortunately its better than 14.3 aircrafts like the coming F16 pobit. If Rafale, Su30sm2, and typhoons moved up to 15.0 then J15-T could be 14.7. Asking to move it down will cause more problems to players below 14.3. Su30MKK is still causing problems sitting at a lower br it should be at, we shouldn’t be creating more compression.
3 Likes