Some basic common sense: Br 14.7 currently consists of the Su-30SM2, AESA Typhoon, and Rafale. When you say ‘not the only ones,’ are you seeing F-15EXs in your dreams?
Stop putting words in my mouth. I never said 48 is ‘great’—I said giving a 14.7 jet only 48 pops is a balance disaster. You’re calling it a ‘challenge’ just to sound brave,you’re just making excuses and singing praises for every single decision Gaijin makes, no matter how broken it is.
Tons of people love Chinese aircraft, but you’re definitely not one of them. You should focus on improving your skills instead of constantly playing the contrarian on the forums, my dear friend—especially when the first thing anyone sees on your profile of Statshark is a massive wall of orange.
@庄方宜
I’ve been saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal this entire time.
Your posts claimed I am wrong for saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal.
Your posts are claiming it’s contrarian to say 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal/enough.
If that was not your intent, then amend your posts, cause your posts may disagree with your intent, and I think you and I actually agree that 48 isn’t enough.
It can’t be 14.3 because the inferior F-18E is 14.3 though.
Also when all you have is statshaming because I play bombers and stock aircraft as well, you’re admitting we’re correct for saying 48 countermeasures isn’t ideal/enough.
And I can’t blame Gaijin for a decision an aircrraft manufacturer made; Gaijin didn’t design and produce the J-15T.
Its tough to balance because top tier air is still compressed. Right now there is just no way J15-T can get more CM. If it didn’t get access to P12A then we could move it down but unfortunately its better than 14.3 aircrafts like the coming F16 pobit. If Rafale, Su30sm2, and typhoons moved up to 15.0 then J15-T could be 14.7. Asking to move it down will cause more problems to players below 14.3. Su30MKK is still causing problems sitting at a lower br it should be at, we shouldn’t be creating more compression.
Where? It’s internal storage is already full. I saw some bug reports for switching to small CM or CM pods but those were just blueprint designs so they all got denied.
Its not modeled but changing CM number like this is gonna cause a domino effect to every plane suffering from low CM as people will just make bug reports with CM blueprints.