The Sherman V is literally the only 3.7 besieds the M42 Contraereo and the M41M, which can both fight good at 4.0… the Sherman is superfluous, want to play it? Go with the US then. The AB 43 and Start are absolutely similar with the ladder offering better penetration which doesn’t matter when you flank… for all intense and purpose the AB 43 is vastly superior. As per the Howitzers… I’m biased to remove them because i don’t like HE slingers, but as i said they should be foldered together because people like them but again, they are useless copy paste… just go with the US if you wonna play them that much
1 Like
Yeah, there is nothing “pure” about WT, so I really don’t get people who are so finicky about some of these details. I mean, you can have ww2 vehicles facing vehicles from the 1980s.
4 Likes
ok pal here is you free of c&p Italian tree
i hope you enjoy having only 1-2 tanks per br in the name of “uniqueness”
2 Likes
Actually I would prefer that - granted u add some more indigenous vehicles. Oh btw, you can bring back the any of them that are different slightly. Pzlll N lacking sideskirts or M109G’s 12.7mm for example
1 Like
you haven’t even played Italy, its better to have 4 tanks in one br so you will be able to have a LINE-UP, until indigenous vehicles (that will take years) all the non-indigenous are fine where they are. you have any idea whats its like to a player with no premium trying to grind with only 1-2 tanks in he’s line-up?
Nah i don’t need a full lineup, i spawn with mist 3 tanks anyway. My french lineup is full and i only use the Char C2… i actually don’t think I’ve ever spawn in something else besides the AMD PaK…
I’m completely fine with this, it’s looks much more interesting to be honest
1 Like
you mean empty, how is a TT interesting with 22 tanks in 4 ranks?
thats your issue i dont want to leave after 1 death
1 Like
I don’t! I stock backups for this exact reason, costs nothing to do… or, i simply not die, i know hard concept to grasp… Only time where I’ll leave before one death is if i don’t like the map which I’m gonna do regardless if i have 1 or 5 tanks
1 Like
So you don’t like having flexibility in your lineup? Not every vehicle performs well on every map.
Italian 5.0 lineup consisting of 2 spgs … leaves a lot to be desired.
“Don’t die” lol… it’s a shame no one else has ever considered that!
2 Likes
You have 15 games with the 2C, you can’t grind efficiently with 1-2 tanks specially when you don’t have premium time or a premium tank
I can assure you I’ll adapt to those tanks, besieds the Breda 501 is everything i could ask for… i probably won’t even use the casemate! Besides that… i never asked for any vehicle to be remove just foldered, I really don’t understand where this comes from
I’ve been doing it till now, dunno what you’re on about
I’d rather they just give free respawns to BRs where nations can’t make proper line-ups with TT vehicles (a bit like reserve vehicles), instead of inundating TT’s with other nations’ crap.
Regardless of what happens to the other redundant vehicles, I’m completely fine with seeing the M44 and M55 go. You can already get them in like, 6 other trees iirc. People already complained enough as is about undetiered CW SPGs prior to M44’s addition. The M44 has only made that issue worse since you can’t escape them ever.
The M55 ruins WW2 immersion just to be a complete gimmick that isn’t even good. It’s not the kind of vehicle that made sense to add as a gap filler in the tree.
2 Likes
tigris shouldnt have been added TAS 44M should have hungary got 13 no where near enough to be techtree the M26A1 was fielded in far larger numbers than the TIGRIS especially since they gave it the OP add on armor on a E model
its just making the german tech tree so un unqiue that they get copy pasted so many german fighters and tanks
honestly should have gotten a different sub tree
You know, Italy manufactured the Leopard 1s, while the M26s and Pattons were used by them. dont knw for the m109 but same sherman used so dont have huge sense deleting all this unit.
and in game we have the leo1a2 without a stabilizer, when in reality it had one
Regarding the integrity of the tech tree: I’d say that lumping all these sub-trees into one massive block of copy-pasted units just drags the game out and makes it boring. Of course, that means losing units like these—which is a shame—but it makes sense for them to go into a new tech tree, especially given all these small nations that buy from other states because they lack the domestic capacity to build their own tanks or aircraft. Besides, we know that 5th-gen aircraft will essentially be copy-pastes for everyone, with only minor variations.
the chaffe should go too with this logic
so still c&p? i removed all c&p because he said he dosent like them, C&P is necessary for small TTs
1 Like
italy have produce all this unit, so he can use what dont need is like added to pointlessly pad out the runtime and why dont added good unit like pzh who italy produce on soil but only for the premium version for hungary dont have sense adding unit like the shilka or the zsu who dont center nothing with italy dont have sense only for pointlessly dragging things out
so? its not there’s design even if something is build in Italy its still a copy paste of another nation
you either like c&p or dont, dont be like " this is a good tank i dont care if its a C&P" and when its a bad tank saying C&P is bad and you dont want it