" * Re.2005 (VDM) — the maximum weight of the secondary weapons has been increased from 655 kg to 710 kg to match the Re.2005 serie 0."
So now it’s as good for CAS, nice! Hope to see more additions to Italian regular tree to use it for grinding.
PS fix Littorio class reloading times and accuracy please
And give us some answer on Ariete armor at least.
I can’t believe this…
Oh… Right, because apparently no one has noticed this for years.
And when the 100mm of KE protection of Brenus ERA?
Very good!
Now please add the missing CCRP symbology to the sights of the Phantoms; Thunderchief, Skyhawks, etc.
Recently the lack if such symbology was fixed for the F-111’s - outstanding work and really a gamechanger for the Aardvarks especially in sim - hopefulyl to be repeated also for the aircraf tmentioned above… = )
That being since September with no word on when it would be fixed.
I can finally use my F-117 again :)
Mig-29 fix when?
They noticed this problem when they tested the new French ELC tank destroyer, which they claim shoots VERY!!! POWERFUL cumulative shells)))Ha-ha)))
Well done, people are working hard, they fix problems when the Snail needs money.
It would be great if you could fix this one here too - its a quick win
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/512i6ZRSHyxy
Fix for HEAT sounds great, can we get a fix for HESH though?
Nice.
When you are goingvto fix Ariete armor and the warkit?
Or the KF-41 APS, the ATGM launcher, the armor and giving the spall liners It should have?
Is there open reports on it? If not, then almost never.
If I am missing any reports for the KF-41 (or for the Puma+Puma VJTF that apply to the KF-41), please let me know and I will add them to the list. I love the KF-41 and want to help the Bug Reporting Managers integrate and/or close duplicate reports to make fixing these issues easier for the Devs 👍
KF-41 APS Issue: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 StrikeShield aps underperforming: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 APS on the middle right side not working: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 APS Malfunction: Community Bug Reporting System
Puma(/VJTF) & KF-41 [30mm MK30-2/ABM] - Incorrect Dispersion: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Spike launcher should be adjustable: Community Bug Reporting System
Puma IFV and KF41 missing PMC 359 apfsds-t ammo: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Missing armor plates on the sides of the KF41 Lynx IFV: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Strikeshield module armor value is wrong: Community Bug Reporting System
(There are 2 accepted reports for lack of Spall Liners, these 2 reports should be integrated)
KF-41 Lack Spall liner: Community Bug Reporting System (Report made Dec 10th, 2023)
KF-41 missing spall liners: Community Bug Reporting System (Report made Sept 14, 2024)
KF-41 Lynx - Rubber Track Pads: Community Bug Reporting System
(But are not closed, and/or have no reply from the Bug Reporting Managers yet etc):
KF-41 ready rack size: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Armor incorrect: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Lynx APS should provide protection against KE rounds: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 IRST, Spike-LR II and APS not working correctly: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 ROSE Smoke grenade explosion distance is wrong: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Wrong armor numerical reference object Turret armor thickness: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 turret wrong protection value: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Lynx incorrect Muzzle Brake: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 (and Puma/Puma VJTF) Inaccurate internal Projectile amount in PMC308: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 Lynx Missing Ammunition: Community Bug Reporting System
KF-41 (and Puma/Puma VJTF) 30 mm MK 30-2/ABM Incorrect Dispersion: Community Bug Reporting System [Dec 30th, 2025] (should be integrated with this accepted report: Community Bug Reporting System [Sept 25th, 2025] )
KF-41 Lynx Rheinmetall Strikeshield model incorrect: Community Bug Reporting System [July 4th, 2024] (should be integrated with this accepted report: Community Bug Reporting System [Sept 29th, 2024])
KF-41 missile launcher elevation error: Community Bug Reporting System [March 29th, 2024] (should be integrated with this accepted report: Community Bug Reporting System [Sept 20th, 2023])
(If the Mods/Community Managers would like to send a note to the Bug Reporting Managers to close some of these duplicate reports):
KF-41 Missing Spall Liners: Community Bug Reporting System (There are also 2 accepted bug reports for this same issue, see list above for links and dates for the 2 other Spall Liner reports.)
KF-41 Active Protection not working: Community Bug Reporting System (This shows “not enough info” but I believe it might be considered a “duplicate” of this report, which was accepted 2 years ago: Community Bug Reporting System )
KF-41 APS being inconsistent and “weird”: Community Bug Reporting System (Possible duplicate)
KF-41 is unplayable at the moment: Community Bug Reporting System (I think this report should probably be closed. The report is not specific about an issue, and it is only cluttering up the other reports for the KF-41)
Thank you Mods, Managers, and Devs! 🍻
When will you adress the Gripens wing model being wrong or admit you’ll change the name since its not an E model?
The F-111F still has the F-5Es RWR and Radar copy pasted as placeholder, when will it gets its own kit?
Merkava fix when?
Namer fix when?
Spyder fix when
What is the point of reporting issues if you eventually get banned for it? Let me explain what usually happens.
A player reports a bug that is caused by multiple issues, such as a bad model, poor game design, or other problems. The moderators decline it and then ask you to create separate bug reports for each issue. You do that—and then you get banned for spamming. Works like a charm.
(In our community there was atleast 14 members banned for this reason :)
Then, if you actually find a critical bug that adds no realism to the game, for example:
Eventually, you receive a moderator message like:
“Unified time for ship ready rack mechanics.”
So what is the purpose of reporting issues if, first, you risk getting banned; second, the game applies selective realism; and third, the report is likely to be rejected anyway?
Sadly, some countries did not deploy their equipment efficiently in real life, and some designs were simply worse overall. But Gajin has magical wand which will fix things.
Let’s bring up the same topic where a tank manufacturer contacted the developers on the forums and explained how their vehicle actually operates and performs. Yet Gaijin responded by saying, “No, it doesn’t—you’re lying.”
No matter what evidence is provided, it’s never considered good enough, because it always comes down to opinion rather than facts.
Banned? I have not heard of this happening, ever. Do you mean muted? Because banned means your account was effectively “deleted”. I have a large amount of doubt that anyone got banned for making bug reports.