Had it head on to the thing and generated a protection map, not testing through clicking and what not. But if it’s finally riocheting instead of sailing through the crew, then yeah, they’re on parity protection wise.
I think that piece of armor is ricocheting rounds on most Leopards.
ground could easily be 15.0 and there would still be a fair bit of compression.
however it risks what happenned to lineups like the 9.0 british one happening all the time and to a much more aggressive scale
2 Likes
The GRB needs a decompression level similar to what happened in the AirRB (although the decompression wasn’t perfect and still needs more).
But the GRB needs to have a BR 14+ similar to aircraft and perform a proper decompression.
2 Likes
Why would the new Abrams be a given when they are mostly just either sidegrades (M1A2 trophy) or going to be slight downgrades over the already existing 12.7 Abrams?
With this current course it’s better to move the SEPv1 and SEPv2 up to 13.0 and leave the SEPv3s at 12.7
Counterpoint with new anti ERA ammo only being on the 2A7 they are even less of equals, I’d say for now they probably should stay together but going forward the 122s don’t have anything going for them, currently over the 2A7 they have 100mm frontal armor being their only advantage. Past that they are still using worse ammo and 1st gen gunner therms
That’s a valid point. Though in my eyes, even though the anti-ERA will be nice, I still see them as relatively equal. That extra top speed is very nice for positioning.
Sure again like I said it’s not the craziest compared to effective pen. I assume as we keep going forward the differences will keep stacking. Like I said I don’t see a reason for them to not be a different BR for now but when we hit like 13.3 I do think that will be the hard cap for the 122s.
They simply don’t offer anything more than armor and spall liners with alright mobility.
For now they are still fine at the same BR. I’m just wondering when we will see other top tier MBTs with APS now that we are entering CAS FnF missile meta where an APS is going to be a requirement
That is true. I think 13.0 is enough for top tier tanks. Though if we want to decompress areas like 7.7-8.7 we’d need to push everything above it ofc.
Imo we need more BRs because CAS is very much compressed.
A reminder the F-18C which has a worse RWR, no ground weapons, no HMS, no later missiles than 120A is the same BR as the other 14.0 Hornets at 12.7 for ground
We need ground to match air in terms of BRs
This lets us decomp CAS and decomp lower tier tank
3 Likes
The BR of the aircraft is so compressed in grb that the Su-30SM-2 (12.7) can face the Kunnas 2000 (11.7) in a match.
The JH7 also faces aircraft that, in Air RB, are 14.3 and 14.7, but In the GRB, what separates the JH7 from these aircraft is 0.3 to 0.7 BR .
Just be a better pilot than them as intended, obviously.
1 Like
Tbf the F-35 is a higher BR than the Tornado in ground RB lol
(The German one with more bombs CM’s is faster and has 9Ls)
This is 10.7 lmao
Same BR as British Phantoms with PD and sky flash alongside the same bombs as F-35
1 Like
What ballistic computer does the F35 have?
Bombs, rockets, cannon
Not too bad then. CCRP?
Aye.
You can use an F5A(G) with one Penguin missile instead of the F35.
:V
1 Like
I agree +1