Yes, but literally, if the turret tells you it can, it means that basically all its electronics, both tracking and follow-through, allow it.
There’s a chance for it to be accepted if the second pdf has better proofs because it doesn’t open for me
If there’s a proof that the turrets electronic support it there’s a good chance that it’ll be accepted
No it doesnt, what it tells you is that you can clear trenches with airburst spacing, which you can do in CV9030/35/40. And it has no purpose in game as you are not shooting at infantry or exposed crew of a crusader AA.
First you need to get autotracker on vehicle, then you need to prove that i can fire programmable ammunition and depending on how nice gajin is whether the operator has any.
Thats literally what gajin has shown you and if you are not biased you can agree thats correct way to go.
There is auto tracker on the namers
Eitan should have it too considering tsrikhon has it and there’s the proof of the turret supporting programmable shells and the gun firing programmable shells too
Hell almost every vehicle has a tracker from 10.0 and above in the Israeli TT
I have a brochure on the sights which prove target tracking capability. What it doesn’t show is the ability to use programmable rounds sadly, which is what I believe gaijin needs
What about this
Eithan turret that specifies it has the capability to use programmable ammunition link: https://www.elbitsystems.com/sites/default/files/2025-02/utmt-30-6pgs_3_print_0.pdf
Note that the one from Eitan is a turret they have, but the one from Israel is a modified version based on the 30MK2.
I can’t open the pdf but according to the guy who posted it it should have enough evidence for it
If you want to bug report this, you’ll need to prove with sourcing the UT30 uses the exact same systems as the one on the Eitan, which is pretty much impossible since we have no sourcing on this turret and it’s allegedly named something stupid like “30mm unmanned turret” lmao
Anyway trying to get information on it will not be promising, so if you try to then a big good luck to you lol
3 Likes
Do they also want me to drive one to their head quarters so they can test it themselves?
Yes, and they’ll give you a free gift if you also give them classified docs in person! (The gifts totally not a ban btw)
Tempting…
Anyone know if the armor on the Eitan is finalized?
I haven’t seen any changes according the datamines that I’ve looked at.
Unless they’ve changed it on the dev today, then absolutely not. The internal armor is literally still called “body_armor” or something like that, the side armor composite blocks all have the same thickness, and the front hull armor is literally just like 5mm RHA and a gap of air.
Do we know if the eitan has spall liners or is it unknown?
Upon further investigation, the official Eitan website specifies that the turret with the 30MKU2 cannon has one of its key functions being to attack infantry and low-flying aerial targets:
https://www.elbitsystems.com/unmanned/ground/unmanned-turrets/ut30mk2-mt30?hl=es-ES
And here is a statement from 2023 saying they are making these modifications to shoot down UAVs and low-flying helicopters, based on what was seen in the war in Ukraine:
1 Like
Likely not, if it does it’s armor integrated meaning haha screw you, you don’t get spall liners bc it’s not Russian technology! (cries in abrams)
2 Likes
Im wondering if devs really dont understand that bushmaster is worthless at such high br. And missiles arent smth redeeming as well due to how bad they are implemented. And you only have 4 of them. I can already bet all ammo will sit in turret so every turret hit will render you completely useless like in namers case. Aps isnt something great either, gl stopping 3bm60, m829 or any other apfsds - dominant ammo type on this br range.
Literally every neat feature this vehicle has was chocked by devs with wire. By br placement, terrible in game implementation and bmpt introduction (this thing casually erases every other autocannon carrier).
I was hoping for some 8.3-9.7 fast autocannon tank with actually useful (at that br range autocannon) like this or achzarit rcws 30 but without spikes (so their br doesnt get inflated so bad) but devs seem to be obsessed with adding unplayable sadmobiles with spikes.
2 Likes
It’s intentional they added so much around 10.7-11.3 all of them are sitting ducks for the bmpt so they can have a good time and maybe buy another premium gaijin actually fixed The ammo going out in one shot but only for the bmpt they gave it an ammo box by labeling it a tank destroyer
I think it needs to specifically say the vehicle is capable of using programmable shells and is carrying it someone needs to do the IRIST slm stunt and ask the company in an email if it was capable of using it and if it was tested otherwise based on those statement they can assume the turret uses HE only for flying targets
this is not yak 141 we can’t just say it was intended to get it unfortunately without any source
1 Like
1 Like
Well apparently it’s part Russian now soo… spall liners soonTM? Lmao
2 Likes