I completely agree. Even Great Britain should join the Commonwealth members (Australia, Canada, India, and New Zealand), leaving Pakistan behind so China can complement itself.
My point was that India shouldn’t be in The British tree because Russian Tech has no place in a very western country. If a really important tank from another TT is going to be added to Britain it should at least be from a Western country.
2 Likes
Israel shouldn’t be got its own tech tree in first place but at the same time, as it’s a tech tree by now, it’s not exclusive to Israel having a bad high battle rating vehicle. The T-72AV (Turms-T) is a great example of this ‘Just a waste of money’ type Premium, and now with the new naval and fictional ships coming is also another good example of this.
But people will still buy those no matter how much times it been told to them the opposite, if the money is going in there’s no reason to go after changing something.
In case of Israel as tech tree is a big forced push, never seen people asking for but it’s in-game—“Just go in!” or something like that. But we can’t argue that the armor is inconsistent, Merkava never faced truly threats but some people running here and there and shooting rockets or rocks into it and being protected by yet efficient but light anti-chemical weapons armor.
Particularly I never seen any footage of a Merkava getting hit directly by another tank in pair of its capabilities, only some aftermath of attacks by ATGMs or anti-tank grenades.
1 Like
Israel has among the strongest 9.3 lineups in the game, and okay top BR lineup.
Its top end isn’t as amazing as USAs or Germany’s, and it’s still serviceable.
If you don’t like top BR matches, play more 9.3.
You are not forced to play any vehicle; play what you want.
@cursive-stare87
Oh no! Britain got a unique squadron vehicle!
Oh no! Benelux added 40% copy-paste to the 60% unique vehicles added! With 2+ unique vehicles being added last major update.
@Константинович7
Israel has more unique vehicles than China does. It definitely deserves its own tech tree.
1 Like
Far from what I know Israel offer only four different main battle tanks with only one major advances from the base model which is the Magach 7,
In other hand China which houses Taiwan offer much more (e.g., M48, M60, Type 59, Type 69 (and variations), ZTZ-88, ZTZ-96, ZTZ-99 and VT-4A1) and even could have more with a possible addition of late Taiwanese technology.
Behind Italy, China is the most diverse ground tech tree in-game that doesn’t require unnecessary research time like USA, Germany and specially USSR with loads of prototypes.
8 Likes
A T-44 is a notably modified T-34.
A T-54 is a notably modified T-44.
A T-55 is a modified T-54.
A T-62 is a further modified T-55.
A M46 Patton is a modification of M26… we’re going to streamline this part.
M47 M46.
M48 M47.
M60 M48.
M60A1 M60.
At some point you get to just before Abrams and Abrams at least shares the road wheels.
If we go China that one goes all the way back to T-54.
Type 59 T-54.
Type 69 Type 59.
Type 88 Type 69.
Type 96 Type 88.
Type 99 Type 96.
All unique tanks share similarities with their fathers that they are built out of the lessons of.
India has many examples of this and yet people say India doesn’t have enough to be it’s own tree
India has less unique MBTs IRL than Israel has unique Magachs [and Sabras].
The T-90 Bhishma TWMP that got added was not unique. There are heavily modified T-90 Bhismas, but the Bhisma TWMP is not unique except for it’s dozer blade which doesn’t make a difference.
If you claim that Israel is unique for having heavily modified M-60s then India would be the most unique tree if added to the game…
it may not make a difference but it is still unique
1 Like
No, the tank itself is the same.
its still a unique tank, the skin/camo and dozer blade are all that are required for that
1 Like
if something as minor as a dozer blade is unique then India would be the most unique in game
It also doesn’t have 3BM60, unlike the Russian version, so I would consider it a unique addition, despite being a Russian vehicle (just like the Mig-21 Bison).
However, you could argue that it should’ve been placed in the Russian tree somewhere, rather than the British tree.
2 Likes
Skin/Camo is only visual, not functional. i guess that means there is no such thing as a Copy/Paste vehicle then because all vehicles have a unique camo.
only beyond like rank 4/5
i said skin and dozer not just skin
Israel also starts at Rank 4. So why are you arguing against India?
i dont think the israel tech tree shouldve been added, at least not in the way it was
Well, India has half the Copy and Paste of China