Well duh, but there are no 10.7 lineups to begin with so nothing would change for Abrams.
Maybe something for M1A1 and IPM1 since they’d only see 4x SEP2/2A7V/T-90M/Strv equivalent tanks, and Leclerc should be put to 11.3 since it’s on-par with M1A1/IPM1 currently.
Oh dang, I forgot to include that Americans and American mains are complaining about team skill as a whole and want players to improve as well as the inaccuracies of Abrams.
My anger got to me a little too well.
It might help, at the very least, you’d stop facing a wall of “full uptier” every match. If you did run say, an 11.3 line-up the most you could see of those running 12.0/12.3 tanks would be 4-8 ish right?
It would be a little better. Might also increase the chance of getting a downtier.
i totally agree with you if they actually do it and fix the tanks after. Bc my problem with the abrams is the turret ring + the hydraulic pump on the center mass of the tank, idc much about armor or other fixs (it would be good, but that is not my focus here), and those problems will still persist any BR.
Dont get me wrong, i fully agree with you. Just to be fair, germany already went through this situation when Leopard 2 PL got released, top tier was near unplayable for a while.
On topic: again, just give me the ring fix and the right spot of hydraulic pump, im asking nothing more. if necessary to nerf the reload speed from 5 to 6 seconds to have theses changes, I’ll accept that too
US top ter suffers and i have 0 post pen with all Russian apfsds. Previous game just hit an M60 on the turret ring the round just passed through and there was 0 post pen, 0 damage on turret ring, breach or crew.
Hitting ammo on centurions, Leopards, M60s 7/10 times results in “yellow” ammo, meanwhile gepards and bagels can pen turret rings, breach, front armor and 1cm of cupola and their round magically explode and all shrapnel takes a 90* turn into the crew compartment.
i dont get why gaijin refuses to put ADATS as SPAA, it something so simple to change… The extra sp cost is really annoying. There is others AAs that can do very well to destroy tanks (gepard for example) and they stay as SPAA cost…
The ADATS performance could do better too, mainly the radar system.
I like how every time the USA low winning rate is being brought up, it’s always the new players on clickbait took the blame lol (while 8/10 matches I played half the team consists of players who left with 2-3 deaths with 0 kill, and oh they are not even the clickbait players, it’s literally worse than one death leaving because these guys fed more points to the enemy team) it were never the incompetence of most USA mains who refused to play their vehicles strength? It’s always the premium noobs bring the entire stat down or blaming the tools “Abrams is too weak, inaccurate compared to irl performance and paper armor”, and funnily these statements also always coming from old players who perform mediocre in their MBT? It is always everybody else’s fault but me
It would be more acceptable if yall man up and stop playing the blame game, this would be somewhat more acceptable if the following thing in order took the blame first
Frequency of CQC/non-hull down maps in rotation
Stubborn players who refused to play defensively and camp more, play by their vehicle’s strength
Visibility, look at all the useless trashes on top of the turret of SEP, even blind map can see you from miles away lol
|
|
|
v