One beautiful mockup
Su-75 from what i know is primarily for export.
Bogdan has said an interview if all goes well should/maybe see it fly early half next year. Not far but not exactly screaming “wow”
Su-75 i doubt is not for their own airforce.
obsessed, clearly I struck a nerve with that one
i really dont care at all lol, its just the crazy part from you calling propagnda while i dont have sides.
i love metal stick go vroom and brick fly. its you who went all the wester like its the most powerfull thing.
Spoiler
Unexpected questions from Russian experts are starting to emerge.
Spoiler
Translation
Russian multirole Su-35C fighters forced the American F-16s, which the West supplied to Kyiv, to fly at minimum altitudes and operate deep in the rear.
This was stated in an interview with TASS by the Director General of Rostec, Sergey Chemezov.
According to him, the Su-35C has effectively “pressed enemy aviation to the ground.”
He noted that the Russian aircraft is capable of hitting targets at long distances — we’re talking hundreds of kilometers.
“Therefore, enemy aircraft simply cannot reach the launch line for their air-to-air missiles. This applies to the American F-16s and the French Mirages as well,” Chemezov noted.
Of course, a logical question arises:
So who, then, has pressed the Su-35s and Su-57s to the ground and prevents them from approaching the launch line for their own hundreds-of-kilometers-range air-to-air missiles, forcing them to operate deep in the rear?
“Experts” lol
Dude, there’s a big difference between you misiterpreting the info and info being lies.
F.e. Moskva got sunk by an accidental fire according to non-western sources, I mean, it wasn’t really sunk, it’s being repaired in a secret dock, and almost nobody died in the incident!
Of course western sources may be overly optimistic or only showing successes while omitting defeats. But that’s a bit different than: no comrade, no missile, is cigarette.
A former RuAF WSO with real combat experience in Syria — is he not an expert?
Well, depends on an area. Like, i would trust this man on his knowledge about Su-34, but generalised takes on how airforce perfoms - i’d be skeptical.
Well, if he were the only one asking such questions — then it would make sense. But that’s not the case.
Who else asks?
It seems to me that anyone familiar with the actions of aviation in local conflicts.
1 Like
Can you, like, provide proofs? Because right now i can only see you and Fighterbomber. You said that he’s not the only one who’s asking.
Are you serious?
Deadly serious. I am a person that just stumbled on this post, got curious and asked you to give me some proofs that what you are talking about is truth. Right now only thing you do is being arrogant about it.
Alright. I meant myself and Fighterbomber. Move along.
Got it. I guess technically it works with
Well it’s not a counterfactual claim is it?
The fact that Russia doesn’t have total air superiority already raises a myriad of questions about capability/strategy, all flogger is doing is forwarding a valuable irl source to share concerns about the ability of the RuAF to maintain an offensive aerial presence.
Then why he didn’t said it himself and requires you to make it clear?
Because he wasn’t initially stating opinion, simply forwarding the source to prompt discourse.
As for his later messages, I don’t want to put words in his mouth so I’ll avoid commenting