“The R-37M was designed for a different type of aircraft – the MiG-31BM Foxhound. This supersonic interceptor operates with the N007M radar. In Ukraine, Russian combat aviation actively uses the R-37M mounted on the Su-35 Flanker-E fighter, which is, however, equipped with an Irbis-E radar. It is the radars that contribute to the missile’s contradictory effectiveness on the battlefield.”
"The Zaslon-M (mig radar)radar operates at a higher power level than the Irbis-E (su radar). It flaunts a peak power output of approximately 400 kW, a stark contrast to the Irbis-E’s peak power output of 20 kW. This increased power allows the Zaslon-M to detect targets from farther distances and with enhanced accuracy. It also enables the radar to penetrate electronic countermeasures more effectively, making it more resilient in a combat scenario. "
work it with what carries it and you have a target slution of less distance… use google man
peak power output of zaslon M is unknown, i would like to see a actually credible source stating its 400kw because thats ABSURD amounts of elec required to run it.
it was a target drone to test the radar, so i dont know exactly
best guess i have seen is that since the manufacturer of the IRBIS says it can detect targets with an RCS of 3m^2 at 350 to 400km, that the target drone was likely at a RCS of around 1m^2
The red one its suppose to be the AESA on Japanese F2. And Ftr same guy did Simulation on Su-57 main GaAs radar and in his calculation it just follow the same as IRBIS.
IF you are arguing that R-37m its limited by IRBIS. Imagine all these radar and Western plane that have worst detection range and Usually relied on AWACS. For long range shots.
idk where you got that information from and i dont really see why russia is evaluating a radar for china,
especailly when russia had the su-35 in service before china
J/APG-1, it uses wattage estimates from the T/R papers we got a bit ago, could potentially be higher due to the unkown duty cycle, which is claimed to be higher then the average which is used here.