Is the Su-57 really worse than the F-22?

I’d also argue a dazzle camouflage does little to optical seekers either.

A target can be seen as long as it contrasts its surroundings, for pure contrast seekers this needs to be clearly differentiated from other contrast, like the ground or other obstacles, or else the seeker loses track. For an imaging seeker the tolerance is expanded for however long a targets image can be differentiated from its surroundings, even if contrasts might overlap.

A dazzle camouflage would still need to blend in with the surroundings to fool either of these seeker types, at which point the paint still can’t universally fool any optical seeker, only help blend into specific environments. I’d hardly consider this an effective countermeasure unless you have specific uses for it (e.g. camouflage against the surrounding area when parked on the ground)

And back on topic for IIR missiles, it is very much irrelevant.

2 Likes


i think this would be classified as razzle dazzle paint scheme i could be wrong

Nope

what do you mean those are there high strength screws used so can tighten things securely without stripping screws the ones they used on the su57 where improper philps head screws which can not be tightened as tight without them striping which means they will fall off eventually

Su 57 wing [1651x960] : r/WarplanePorn
temp_image_BF2543BD-505D-4577-95E4-E5F1A055A2D6

you have to zoom in on the bottom one to see the screw head

the screws on the su57 are already striping from over tighting

First image is literally a pre-production airframe, bort 510 Blue. New series airframes have fasteners more flush to the body of the aircraft.

really do you know where i can find a photo of them

you can steal one in china/russia

I dont have a horse in this race.

Of course the F-22 will be superior with it’s stealth capability, it’s Radar and sensor suites are a little dated now compared with some Gen4.5 and 5 airframes. As an air superiority fighter its the pinacle in every measure. When you set them up with an EAWACs aircraft DL their BVRAAMS they become death.

But thats not what the Su-57 or J-20 are designed to do. Russia and China know they cannot hope to defeat the US airforce, they dont have enough Gen 5 airframes and are both lagging behind NATO in certain areas. What they do know though is that it doesnt matter how good an F-22 is if its not got gas or a DL. Su-57 armed with R-37M is a huge threat to any US command control and support assets.
The J-20 with it’s BVRAAM is the same.

With the future conflicts set to be fought over Russia/Ukraine and Taiwan. The US will depend on tankers and EAWACS aircraft to maintain operational tempo. Remove a few of these and you start to impact NATO air strategy.

1 Like

well… theyre getting a lot of updates

1 Like

They are the funding has been allocated, but current F-22 fleet are a little long in the tooth.
No antiquated but not the pinacle like they once were.

With Peregrine, HMD and the new Radar they will be elevated once again


Beautiful 😍

4 Likes

already does have. soon will get updated with another HMD

I know it was set for integration in 2024

The Su-57 seen in the photo is not a serial production model - which underwent a major redesign before production. I already covered this uneducated comparison before.

It would be the same as comparing the YF-22 to a production Su-57.

I also feel it silly to compare the SU-57 to the F-22 when the SU-57 is supposed to be a competitor to the F-35.

If it would come to warthunder yes in sim because sim is more distance based and stealth capabilities are more useful but in a realistic battle it would probably not make a much of a difference, because the su-57 has emitter locating that means it can detect a radar emitter and using the f22 without it’s radar is probably not done.

isnt the an apg 77v1 already on the 22?

also, what is peregrine?


1350km/h