I repeat, you may have missed my message.
If you think that Russia has stopped production of the Su-57, you are deeply mistaken.
New facilities have recently been commissioned to speed up development of the Su-57.
Su-57 will be produced more and more
1 Like
In avionics, yes. In airframes not entirely. The remedy for the issues that particular F-22 picture that is floating around is replacing the panel and every fastener on it. Not a big deal on 4th gen airframes, pain in the ass on 5th.
It does.
DCCs stay losing :shrug:
What do you mean?
1 Like
Aggressor camo
Partical streaks can pop up is as little as 1 flight, for any number of reasons put particularly residual fluid in the jet.
Best job I ever had, regardless of the shit you put up with. Hate us when you aint us
Comparing anyone to Lazerpig makes them look like an expert. I still don’t think RedEffect is a super good source honestly
Read it again yourself - I said that analysis of what we do know gives some likely values and effects - that is also a FACTUAL STATEMENT
Here’s another “factual statement” - putting you head in the sand and ignoring the best information that is available is not a position that supports any argument at all.
Lmao.
I’ll wait for you to get some English comprehension under your belt - start with what “suggesting” means.
Your inability to comprehend argument about possibilities is a limitation you need to get over if you are to survive crossing the street some time.
Feel free to provide an actual counter argument or alternative analysis
My three cents are that I’d take F-22 any day since even though not a lot were made, there’s still more of them than SU-57s and by a good margin.
Stealth with rcs of F-18? Compare with rcs of a bee? i guess I don’t need to say much about who gonna win maybe don’t even need to take a raptor to compare
1 Like
F22 is overhyped vaporware that only has a combat record of a chinese weather balloon
1 Like
Whatever is marked as F35 there is most definitely NOT an F35
3 Likes
Ah yes, the fabled honey bee
I don’t understand why you’re arguing with me.
If you don’t like some of the numbers in the patent, then contact the Sukhoi Design Bureau.
By the way, the patent does not mention the T-50 at all.
Global defence corp is one of the worst defence site. Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Global defence corp.
- Design and Application
- Propaganda (Yes, both sides)
- Every single time USSR / RUS said they have this amazing thing, the US went and overcompensated, turning their healthcare budget to unalive care.
- USSR / RUS has always had a history of over promise and under deliver.
As a distant observer, knowing that link 16 is a thing, I would put my money on the F-22. Especially when thinking back on the B-2, F117 and SR-71.
6 Likes
It’s not that I don’t understand them, I know exactly what they mean.
The Su-57 quite literally did not exist at this point. The first Su-57 was made in 2020, after 2 major redesigns in 2015 and 2017, and 2020 itself.
Sorry, but I’m not interested in how many Su-57 prototypes there were and what they were called.
We are now talking about a patent that indicates the RCS values that they wanted to obtain.
👆