Read it again yourself - I said that analysis of what we do know gives some likely values and effects - that is also a FACTUAL STATEMENT
Here’s another “factual statement” - putting you head in the sand and ignoring the best information that is available is not a position that supports any argument at all.
Lmao.
I’ll wait for you to get some English comprehension under your belt - start with what “suggesting” means.
Your inability to comprehend argument about possibilities is a limitation you need to get over if you are to survive crossing the street some time.
Feel free to provide an actual counter argument or alternative analysis
My three cents are that I’d take F-22 any day since even though not a lot were made, there’s still more of them than SU-57s and by a good margin.
Stealth with rcs of F-18? Compare with rcs of a bee? i guess I don’t need to say much about who gonna win maybe don’t even need to take a raptor to compare
F22 is overhyped vaporware that only has a combat record of a chinese weather balloon
Whatever is marked as F35 there is most definitely NOT an F35
Ah yes, the fabled honey bee
I don’t understand why you’re arguing with me.
If you don’t like some of the numbers in the patent, then contact the Sukhoi Design Bureau.
By the way, the patent does not mention the T-50 at all.
Global defence corp is one of the worst defence site. Even Wikipedia is more reliable than Global defence corp.
As a distant observer, knowing that link 16 is a thing, I would put my money on the F-22. Especially when thinking back on the B-2, F117 and SR-71.
It’s not that I don’t understand them, I know exactly what they mean.
The Su-57 quite literally did not exist at this point. The first Su-57 was made in 2020, after 2 major redesigns in 2015 and 2017, and 2020 itself.
Sorry, but I’m not interested in how many Su-57 prototypes there were and what they were called.
We are now talking about a patent that indicates the RCS values that they wanted to obtain.
👆
pre-production models and non combat cleared airframes
Russia has a GDP smaller than Texas. The US is the largest economy in the world with the largest military budget.
There’s your answer.
Yet you’re frothing over a document made about the first prototype variant… Funny.
They don’t have a patent that indicates RCS? They have a patent indicating the EPR goal of T-50-0.
Realest of the real
RCS is like LOS armour thickness, it changes drastically depending on what angle you look at it.
the F-22s given RCS is its minimum possible RCS.
the Su-57s given RCS is its minimum possible RCS (if not the average).
Imagine thinking naked GDP means anything. At least have some decency and adjust by PPP
