Would you happen to know how it is worse, specifically? Like what is worse on it?
2 Likes
I won’t say what exactly is worse in it.
There is no differential model for export of the N035… It’s exported as-is.
no one will export the radar as it is
They even have different indexes
Unless it’s a MiG-29 9-41 / 9-47, or in technicality an Su-30MK2 (which is hilariously better than the M2)
Such as? Both are an N035, both share the Irbis-E name. Unless you can mystically pull up a never-before-seen designation relegated to Chinese export models…
And how is it better?
N035 and N135
but are they different in their performance?
or are they the same in that regard
ECCM.
The N135 doesn’t exist. I’m sorry to say, but you fell for another Pankov myth of relevancy.
What?
The Sh135 isn’t a radar system, it’s an avionics suite. This in no ways translates to the erroneous “N135”, as there is no such thing.
Let me guess, you think the SPO-150 exists too?
Feel free to use all images and text as you wish.
Radar N135 “Irbis”
Oh boy, text on a screen! My turn!
You obviously can’t read
I’ll read when there’s something of substance to read… Not an uncited screenshot of what could be no more than the delusions of an indian blogpost.
The Sh-135 system exists, the N135 does not.
1 Like
Sh-135 This is an integral part of N135
Uh huh.
Kind of getting off topic here,let’s get back to su57
What are your guys thoughts on su57 L band aesa radar?
Well, a well maintained F-22 should have a significantly lower radar signature than the Su-57, but there are newer Su-57 versions with a reduced radar signature than the original version. In terms of Radar and electronics well only experts can truly determine which ones are more effective, historically speaking US has had the advantage there.
But Izdelie 30 engines definitely bridge the gap in flight performance and super cruise. In terms of ordinance well both sides have potent long range missiles. It will depend on outside factors such as ground radars, satellites, AWACS and on board datalinks to determine who wins the engagement.
US has the advantage in terms of where it can deploy its equipment (most of europe) that is the single biggest advantage that the F-22 has, take that away and you have a different game on your hands.
Well according to the Key.AERO website it is desginated as the radiolocation system. " The Su-35 is one of the most advanced jets in Russian service – primarily due to its sensors and weapons. Its Sh135 Irbis (Snow Leopard; for export Irbis-E) radiolocation system comprises the N135 radar and Khibiny-M ECM suite. The N135 is an evolution of the Su-30MKI/SM’s N011M Bars radar and employs a passive electronically scanned array (PESA) with two SOLO-35.01 (initial signal processing) and SOLO-35.02 (data processing and radar control) computers. The Type 4283MP IFF (identification, friend or foe) interrogator is integrated within the Sh135. Compared with the Bars, the Irbis advantages include a wider range of operational frequencies, greater angular search zone of up to +/-125º due to its improved antenna and double-step drive, increased range and improved jamming resistance. The Sh135 is capable of tracking-while-scanning up to 30 targets in the air – eight of which can be quasi-continually tracked with accuracy sufficient for simultaneous engagement by beyond-visual range (BVR) active-radar R-77 air-to-air missiles (AAMs) – NATO codename, AA-12 Adder. Two targets can be engaged at the same time with semi-active radar-guided R-27R/ER missiles (AA-10 Alamo-A/-C respectively) as long as they are illuminated." Here is the website Sukhoi Su-35 The Ultimate Flanker.
Now I am not sure how accurate this is but it has useful info about its radiolocation system Sh-135 and N135 radar. Is this info correct or speculation on behalf of AERO website?
Another website called military periscope states that the Irbis-E radar uses the N 135 designation. Overview — N135 Irbis — Airborne Radars — Military Electronics — Weapons — Military Periscope