So I noticed on the A-4E that there’s two mounts on the wings that are empty but there plenty of space for two more rocket pods plus the jet can hold a lot more weight.
Is there a historical reason why its like this?
1 Like
Edit: I found an ordnance chart. On the left most column go to code R-1. FFAR rocket pods on in a 1-2-3-2-1 configuration.
3 Likes
Is there any reason behind them not putting 3 rocket pods on those pylons?
I’d assume those pods are omitted because of the undercarriage covers, which in the case of the Skyhawk protrude quite a bit in that direction…
i have no idea. Maybe the pod would sit too close to the gear or something. I would have no idea where to find that information.
1 Like
It could have something to do with the flaps
That would make sense. Been a while since I have flown the a4 so I forgot how far out the landing flaps go.
Found this here:
Note that LAU-3 and LAU -10 are only carried in two’s on stations 2 and 4…
You’re late to the party xD
Have you found any reason why? I’m not at my computer so it’s hard to tell if there’s any mechanical interference.
Hey, you smuggled that in later, didn’t you?!? = )
2 Likes
I doubt that. Don’t see where they could collide. Gear doors seem more probable to me.
I smuggled something in??? No I didn’t! You’ll have to prove it! I don’t smuggle anything, only legal items to be found here!
I’d assume it’s just standard practice to keep pods off of that pylon, maybe from exhausting gases damage flaps or gear. I honestly have no clue.
Haha, jus’ joking. Could have sworn that table wasn’t there when I first read through the thread, but funny that we both found the same…
1 Like