Is that normal

Machinery of War Discussion Ground Vehicle
,
25

The hull has mounts for dynamic protection. It is not there only because it was not the purpose of the tank modification and testing.

But according to snail standards, even if a certain piece of equipment was not installed on some vehicle, but there was a POSSIBILITY of installing it, then nothing prevents you from adding it.

I will not list the aircraft on which missiles appeared just because they could be installed.

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/2mZaLYmghVbq

As there is no technical limitation preventing the aircraft from mounting the gunpod, this is considered within the standards for the game. As long as it remains technically possible to mount, it can be considered.

26

image

27

German main moment - thinking people can’t see your topic history.

2 Likes
28

and there is where you are wrong

The strv 122 uses german composite matieral for the add on as well. It is a mistake by gajin that they are modelling it wrong for whatever reason. The 2A7V is way newer and if anything should have the better armor add on plates since it developed out of the strv122 one.

29

that has nothing to do with german main moment.
Go look at Vamilad that french main which repeats everyone of his topics X times

30

I don’t like any main. Play all nations, I say.

1 Like
31

I don’t know what it is you’re trying to tell me.

In-game it uses the T-80BV hull already:
afbeelding

The designation refers to the revised hull array introduced in 1985, we don’t have a T-80BV in War Thunder, merely a T-80B with Kontakt-1 which is a seperate vehicle.

32

Because just because they look similar doesn’t mean they’re identical.

33

2a7v ones should be better if anything

34

If you have declassified sources, make a bug report.

35

there is, gajin just doesnt wanna acknowledge it since leos are already dominating,

Bigger proof is simply that sweden literaly ordered german versions of the 2a8 as well.
Either way gajin gonna need to fix it somehow once 2a8s get implemented

36

That’s not proof of anything

37

u have no idea what the add on even is or how it came to be so sure buddy whatever u think

38

Doesn’t matter what I think, its what you can prove in a bug report.

39

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/oMqKiGrKQSpU

It takes 2 seconds to look this up (but gee some people would rather have things placed before them on a silver platter right).

The report has been accepted by the devs a whole year ago, they’re not acting on this because 2A7V is already performing well.

1 Like
40

Accepted means its been accepted by the moderators to pass on to the devs for them to look at, not accepted by the devs.

41

Okay and?

42

And until its closed one way or another, we have no idea how valid it is.

43

image
image828×1132 138 KB

Germany had identical add-on armor to 122s on “their Leopard 2s” 20 years ago (surely a variant that’s been produced by EODH is going to be worse just cus, surely), and, once again, because you are the type who would rather be served information than spend 10 minutes looking for it yourself (you didn’t even bother to read thru the bug report where I had explained all of this already), 2A7Vs current armor values are equal to Leopard 2 IVTs… but you probably have no idea what the IVT was anyways.

44

there was that one newer book that said the strv122s add on became the standard for future stuff 2a6hel and 2e as well, just aint finding it anymore