a number Y that might be convinced to make a purchase and a number Z that would have bought the vehicles for the old prices anyways.
If the amount of Y is not big enough, they will obviously just take the money from Z, maybe even raise the prices, and get money from Y during sales a few times a year rather than lowering the prices throughout the whole year and handing out “freebies” to Z who would even pay 100 USD for a vehicle to play it at release.
Well god, you’ve done your research? you know whether they did their research or not?
You said this like you’re the finance guy from gaijin lmfao.
I have employed a common communication technique known as “make a statement intentionally false to highlight the utter ridiculousness of something.” Everyone who is familiar with the EU knows that Hungary is… a troubled member. Therefore, a statement claiming otherwise will amuse them and reinforce the statement that claiming experts know everything to be equally ridiculous.
A statement made that “Financial experts have come to a conclusion” can be justly countered with a statement highlighting a country’s tendencies. If economic experts coming to a conclusion always comes out as the correct one, there’d be no such infamy - aye?
If even basics irritate you so much that you believe you are talking to “the finance guy from gaijin lmfao”, it would be quite a waste of time to provide you with a more in-depth analysis.
Responses that disagree with your opinion also seem to rile you up quite a bit. And while that could be interesting for a while, it is not what I came here for. So I’ll leave you alone.