I certainly wasn’t going to let you imply I was “young” (inmature) without a rebuttal.
What exactly have you added in this topic that would benefit US Ground top tier?
You asked what was good about US top tier, I responded that the Abrams is a good tank.
Then you moved the goalpost saying that the Abrams was broken. A tank being broken doesn’t mean it can’t be good. Whether or not you can use it well is a different story.
No matter what we say, you’ll just move the goalpost.
3 Likes
I did not move the goal post, you guys took it upon yourselves to change the context of the question. The question already addresses the current state of the Abrams. This question was to address the other vehicles in the US lineup
Yes tou did. First it was this:
And after I said that the Abrams is a very capable tank, it suddenly turned into this:
Aka the goalpost was moved. Everytime we give an answer you’ll just add it to the “without mentioning XYZ” part.
The Abrams is a good tank even if it’s broken. So it can be listed as a reason for why top tier US is good.
Are you intentionally ignoring the second sentence?
Yes, because like I said 10x now, something being broken does not prevent it from being good.
You asked for reasons why US top tier is good. If you wanted your second sentence to hold any weight you should have asked for any things that aren’t broken in the top tier US lineup.
You can say the abrams is good 100000 times. It’s still not what I asked. I’m sorry you are having difficulty understanding the nature of the question.
You are asked to name what was good about US top tier besides CAS. I answered. US has 4 very solid MBTs with a diverse support lineup.
Yes they are broken and should be fixed, but they are still really good and capable tanks. That you go negative in all of them doesn’t change that, it just tells something else.
- Bradley is under armored and the AGMs work poorly
- ADATS is useless for both anti aircraft and anti tank purposes, terrible line of sight radar and is classified as a spaa with the same spawn point requirements as an MBT
- M1128 is only useful in certain maps
- HSTVL has the wrong sabot penetration
- LAVAD is decent but the FIM missiles are lackluster and short ranged
- XM975 is worse than both ADATS and LAVAD but higher BR’ed than the LAVAD
The whole point of the question was to bring attention to how bad everything else performs
3 Likes
Honestly this should be considered more, because I rarely play with sound on anymore (and when I played only AAB/ARB I never had sound on) because I can’t really use speakers where I live, a lot of the time it’s just too boring most of the time to not listen to something else, and the sound system for War Thunder isn’t the most accurate anyways.
lmfaooooo fucking blacktail man. absolute schizo.
sounds like necrons. did i tell you one time i was i na game with necrons, and he rage quit after someone killed him from has spawn sniping spot on the middle east map?
Utilize headphones with directional wavelengths. Also turn down your engine volume and max enemies’.
Yes it’s boring. It also improves your awareness greatly.
1 Like
The Abrams is good enough for players who utilize every tool needed to take advantage of enemies’ weaknesses. It is not stellar. The turret ring bug and the hydraulic pump/reservoir bug and the manual handcrank back-up are all things that should be corrected.
Not merely “for hoots and giggles”. It is an accurate representation of the tank.
We allow players to utilize ammo in Russian and Soviet tanks that don’t even detonate 25 or 30 percent of the time when struck by APFSDS, I’m fairly sure we can eliminate the bugs in the Abrams
The Chally has been bugged and its been done to death by others just as passionate, and I stand by their reasoning. Again, Gaijin should want to do right by their modeling.
2 Likes
shouldnt this be modeled so even if the hydraulics are destoryed the turret can be turned at a much slower rate
would that even be grounds for a bug report?
2 Likes
WT community when you ask for the Abrams to be fixed
waiting for that update
2 Likes
I agree, but I think the good players can achieve more with the Type 10, which has similar advantages and disadvantages to the Abrams.
1 Like
They fixed this 7 month ago in 2.35.0.26.
1 Like
You had a golden opportunity for alliteration and you chose Andy instead of One death Debra’s
Opportunity wasted
2 Likes
Incorrect, I’ve still had rounds all the way through the matches go black and not detonate.
I’d argue that’s incorrect. With the meta of ‘smaller maps = more fun’, the BVM gets way more fun than the Abrams. Just because you can get ‘more’ out of a vehicle when you have enough paid back-ups doesn’t mean it’s better or more fun, it just means you learn how to handle more foes while the rest of your team one death Andys and quits out of sheer frustration and disgust.
I can understand this critique.
That’s because it is. Even Type 90 B Fuji premium is god-mode if you have situational awareness and know how to maneuver through the map.
Debra at least does better work and smiles, Andy’s been needing out of the office yesterday.
1 Like