Perhaps if the playing field was level, you wouldn’t be so condescending on how US mains play. 70% of the deaths I suffer are due to poor shots which break the turret ring. Those are the shots which bounce from the lower portion of the turret into the hull. This can be from any angle and no amount of hull down will fix this. This is a Gaijin problem, not a player problem.
Really depends on how much actual thickness is there. Not to sound biased but does anyone REALLY think that the US military would overlook such a design flaw after 40+ years of revisions and service? Sad to use this photo but it helps. There’s at least 1 foot (300mm) of angled armor between the exterior of the tank and the actual turret ring. Now you’re telling me any amount of APFDS is getting through that? I highly doubt that unless it’s through the breach.
38% win rate is a statistic. It has nothing to do with the player base’s skill and everything to do with the performance of the US MBTS. Find me one review on YT saying the Abrams is a GOOD vehicle. You can have the crappiest player defeat a rather good player in a abrams just because it’s not up to par. I’ve seen plenty of crap players playing other nations as well. It’s not a US only thing, it’s just more pronounced because the Abrams has so many ridiculous flaws.
Win-rate is a skill statistic, nothing more.
Thunderskill, as well as the college course stats 101, both say your posts are wrong.
Abrams is a great MBT, always has been; if it wasn’t people wouldn’t have dominated T-80BVMs with ease in the past, and peoples’ KDRs among MBTs would be in major disparity.
For one did that guy say AR18 lmao how slow, secondly, he is right. think about it. The United States of America the most powerful nation in the world proven fact has a 38% win rate in a military simulation game. It’s not the players it’s the equipment. Do you know how bad it is for a player to do horrible shot and still knockout, your ring and barrel and kill crew bro That’s not even real never has an Abrams been killed that way they killed by top of attack side hits
And did you factor in abnormalities? No, you didn’t. Great job going to a college course, I didn’t ask. You choose not to acknowledge the turret ring issue and for what reason, I have no idea. I don’t care about your KDR, great for you. I care about the abrams being fixed, nothing more.
Right a video game that claims to simulate vehicle warfare. Have you forgotten a game that asks people to spend money on it and promises to give them something pretty close to a simulated vehicle warfare
Cross-analysis: M1A2 is equivalent to T-80BVM in protection with hull and turret swapped, has a vastly superior round, and a superior reload.
Stats around tanks: KDR/KMR ratio of like-vehicles PER PROFILE. You can’t compare every player.
Glad you agree with me that bugs with Abrams should be fixed.
Making stuff up about the Abrams to make it look bad does not create demand to fix the real issues.