Thing is, I proof-read what it output… It’s not AI slop, it’s just you trying to dismiss what I’ve put up so you don’t have to address the wall of text that I put up, to maintain your stance…
The fact you put up the wall of text in the first place is to overwhelm and tie-up so you can further pick an argument like you’ve done the entire time you’ve been in here, because I was commenting.
Or, more likely, to prove your claim wrong by providing extensive argument as to why is it wrong.
no, because what you said is unfounded without anything to back it up and you pass that as okay because youre just discussing. You actually dont want your opinions to be challenged.
Anyway, Im done here.
Theres nothing to gain from you, theres no discussion to be had with you because you cant just admit you were proven wrong.
Individual performance does have impact on your winrate, its not team dependent. I provided proof that it is not “gaming the system”. Anyone can challenge it if they want, Im not stopping them, in fact id welcome it.
It’s not the management though, it’s more the feeding of the players ‘issues’ to make out that the game is the issue, or that they have to play in one way and one way only.
So who am I appealing to get that post put back… That seems a bit unfair to have the ‘AI slop’ entertained, ignoring the points made within it.
I did proof read it and I agree with it, so it’s not ‘bad’.
The disingenuous method of discarding it as AI slop is the problem here. (Let alone the fact it even got flagged, entertaining that method of removal is just wrong on a discussion forum.
If that is the case, then their wall of text should also be removed)
In my experience i see people camp more often in city maps then in those wide open maps. Maybe more cory maps means more encouraging players to camp and compete the missions objective
I wouldnt have to argue if most people bothered to spend 20 seconds thinking before they write their posts with no facts to back them up; and if people didnt think subjective opinion counts as fact
To be honest there are many culprits here, myself included over the years.
I just said it because I saw something similar on another post - arguing that is.
People who continue to argue even after being proven wrong aren’t defending truth anymore, they are defending their ego lol instead of admitting they are wrong, they put their pride on the table twist their argument to protecc their self-image. Some losers like the other guy see backing down after being proven wrong many times as weakness instead of maturity.