Like i said at this point we will just have to wait and see what gaijin cooks up
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/42TKQybSK2b2
I was looking at this IRIS-T SLM bug report that got accepted (even though it was a nerf) just to see if I could find similar sources as to what he used since it got immediately accepted. His report references the “Munitions Safety Information Analysis Center (MSIAC)” for NATO. I visited the site and it is a secure website so you can’t even get access without requesting access from a NATO ran website.
Coupling the restricted nature of this site with the fact that the person who submitted this report was banned from the forum in the past for posting classified documents, it seems a little weird to me that his report was immediately accepted and it is from a website that no one else can access.
It’s almost like he is using personal access to restricted sources to get his own bug reports accepted and Gaijin allows it because they can keep it confidential on the bug report site and it remains under the table.
Anyway, just trying to learn how to deep dive into Google searches to find any more sources. I don’t have much hope with how much has already been explored by everyone here.
13 Likes
Would this be another secondary source for the speed? It doesn’t look promising at it appears to be a magazine and a lot of it is in hindi but I think it seems to be from an official government organization, the “Defence Research and Development Organisation” or DRDO for short.
It references the IRIS-T SLM on page 16 and at the end of the section it states that the IRIS-T SLM has a speed of mach 3 with “very short reaction times” lol.
Edit: It actually cites it’s source as this website.
I believe I have already seen this website rejected as a secondary source. Although, this is what the source requirements state, “expert” opinion publications, industry magazines etc. This source would seem to be an “expert opinion publication” or maybe even an “industry magazine”.
Seems so, their claim comes from a website called army-technology, I don’t know how trustworthy it is or if it can be used a secondary source. Maybe @Dontkev-psn knows something.
Yeah, I got excited about the first mention of a speed I found that I posted before checking if they cited their source. I edited my post with the army technology source.
Doesn’t count as a valid source.
Anyone can access the source he used. It’s a public document from DTIC.
Ahhh, ok. I tried searching for it on the MSIAC website itself because that was the only thing I thought I had to go on and that website itself is restricted. Thank you for the clarification.
i think they have intentionally nerfed it. just like how they have nerfed a lot of aircraft till they add more for other tt and balance it. i think they will buff the other spaa depending on their performances , who knows maybe if the entire playerbase plays really badly in the slm/new sams maybe they will BUFF it in the first week.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
2 Likes
you will be able to replicate that in war thunder with the slm. intercepting all kinds of munitions.
Does anyone know for sure if SLM has DL or command update in test server?
It had DL 100%
Ok. Thx. Trying to get that for CSSA5 and Gaijin said that was a new thing.
Lmao, can you link the report?
[DEV] FB10A should have dual guidance (ir + update command/saclo // Gaijin.net // Issues
FB-10A
IDK why somebody said SACLOS but it is essentially DL. Just that the other SPAA with ACLOS like ITO90M and Tor and Pantsir all got SACLOS for some reason. Here it should really be DL.
1 Like
The comment of the Mod is the best xD
Seems like you got the same Mod as we had with our SLM, Did you tried allready reaching out to an Tech-Mod on the Forum and explain the situation?
Because Update Command sounds realy like Datalink
That’s the problem, bug reports say CLOS. There is no such thing as IR/CLOS in game. Report specifying that it is DL must be made.
Yep, Gunjob said it was a new feature cause the issue guy mistakenly put it as SACLOS and not DL, but it is command update and never said DL, although as implemented it is effectively DL, so it’s hard to do as all the other command updates on SPAA barring IRIST which specifically said DL has been simplified to SACLOS.
Ehh, in this case you are doomed…