Really depends on PoV, once again, this is my personal opinion.
I live in Iran, I know what is real and what is not 🤷♂️
There lies the issue, some random shooting range doesn’t justify an addition. How one can model and implement a vehicle if there are no manual or technical specifications for a tank?
If the name of a weapon is unknown, how is it supposed to make an addition to the game?
Swedish vehicles have some uniqueness and have documentation. With their addition to the game, the rounds they fired, the armor, the crew placement, and many more main factors were known.
What does Karrar fire? How are the crew located? What is the engine performance or even its name? The armor, transmission, turret, internal structure, etc., etc. are all unknown.
All of the Swedish vehicles are documented either by the manufacturer or relevant organizations. The same goes for Israeli and Chinese vehicles. At the same time, nothing can be found for most of the posted tanks.
As I said, my personal opinion is the addition of specific vehicles as event/premium vehicles, like the Iranian F-14 Tomcat, T-72, T-55, and Chieftain series. Phantom II and F-5 have their own place
Those Daniofsk has posted, besides the well-known ones, are just random copy-pastes with just name changes, some of them haven’t even seen a few kilometers of movement on their own.
Exactly my point. If the vehicles are questions themselves, then their addition is just out of the question.
There are some very cool military vehicles used by Iran in the Iran-Iraq war, some of them received some modifications both during the war and a bit after. These, in my opinion, are worthy of addition, not some stuff that even the manufacturer doesn’t know about.