How about we keep the new Wiki but add all the stuff it is lacking from the old one?
I want my vehicles History Section, Pros and Cons as well as a page for aircraft guns.
1 Like
New Wiki is missing one very important information: ammunition numbers to fill ammo racks.
Its a very important piece of WT knowledge that boosts the survival chances.
It is still available on an old wiki and it needs to be transferred to 3.0.
5 Likes
Even if gaijin does not bring the old wiki back completely, they should at least allow people to edit it again. Though bringing it back completely would be the best.
1 Like
it is missing from here.
If someone goes to the wiki, they won’t see it.
1 Like
I think that is the case for many of the older event vehicles and some of the removed premiums.
1 Like
It’s a wiki. It should not be that way.
2 Likes
It’s folded under the tech tree 1944 for some reason. Don’t know why.
2 Likes
Cause thats how it is in the game aswell. The TTs on wiki copy the game TTs.
Told you already - it is foldered in the 1944 IS-2
I thought gaijin can’t possibly get any more greedier, yet here we are, selling decals as packs for wiki update
EDIT: OMG, its old topic, and i just thought its something new…
It’s not a wiki. Not any more.
A wiki is a collaboratively edited hypertext site. The thing called “War Thunder Wiki 3.0” is a shiny vendor-maintained media site with some social media-type features, and that may accept user-submitted articles. But collaborative editing? Gone, gone, gone.
6 Likes
Completely agreed.
Old war thunder wiki was so much better, new wiki is barely usable. No vehicle history, external links, info on shells and weapon systems and in general the things that we loved. The new wiki is pratically a downgrade.
#Bringbacktheoldwiki
2 Likes
The old wiki lacks sort by BRs as well as improved search functionality.
Info on shells and weapon systems are currently on the new wiki:
There’s even missile statcards:
Spoiler
1 Like
come on Gaijin
(yes I have refreshed the page and re-logged in)
2 Likes
the wiki still misses the information how many countermeasures an aircraft carrys internaly
2 Likes
Also lacks proper Flaps speed limits…
2 Likes
It is also very much a step back, in regards to the information of armour on ground vehicles. Now it is only the armour thickness listed on the statcard, where before it had the different armour plate thickness with the angle of the armour plates.
Old:
New:
The thing I am constantly reminded of with the new wiki, is how much information it is lacking compared to the old wiki. And a lot of that information is fully visible on the old wiki, but not anywhere on the new one.
At the same time, i really miss the more detailed pages for the weaponry, such as tank cannons, missiles and bombs etc., where there were typically more detailed information of the weaponry visible compared to the individual vehicle pages.
3 Likes