Would love to get it buffed yet it was the first none RR thread to get a part 2 has countless bug reports filed and most of the “fixes” were just nerfs still missing a bigger ready rack when its been proven that the ready rack isnt jus those 4 rounds but here we are
then you get the same issue people have been complaining about Canada and Australia being split between 3 trees and never being able to make a line up
2 Likes
Is it really that big of a deal though? It makes more sense to focus on the main 10 or so trees
Plus a lot of Singapore air and ground stuff wouldn’t really line up in BR anyways
i mean yeah its pretty big issue especially if they could make an ASEAN tree that would solve that issue, hell might see it in the future since they seem to working on that eastern Europe tree (which solves a lot of issue of people not wanting their tanks in the soviet tree)
And make like 3 other trees pointless because an ASEAN tree will be packed with copy paste from tons of different countries? If it needs multiple countries to be packed together to be viable then I don’t think it’s a good idea
And how does that make 3 trees pointless? last I checked they dont get the best of any one nation baring spaa and if your concern is leopard 2s or F35s that ship has long since set sail
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
They get Flankers, F-15’s F-18’s, and F-16’s as well as Gripens? Rafales and of course a variety of other aircraft/ground vehicles i don’t know about, all in one tree
and…? again most of the time they dont get the top of the line versions of these planes? so again how does that make any tree pointless?
Why spend all the time grinding other trees when you get a pretty similar or effectively the same vehicle of 3-4 nations in one. There’s enough copy pasting already
so why not go play italy then? they have their own mbts as well as leopards, their air tree has mig 29s gripens F16s and eurofighters I wouldnt say italy made germany america britain or russia pointless?
4 Likes
Britain, US Germany and Russia still have a lot of other vehicles across other BR’s. An ASEAN tree would be filled with vehicles from other nations from top to bottom.
They would get all 3 of the main US 4th gens, the latest Rafales, modern Flankers, and Gripens, and that is just top tier air
There is a difference though.
In the case of the VT4, some players are demanding that the Thai VT-4 not be deployed alongside the Thai subtree, the location where by all established standards that vehicle should go. Those players want an exception to a rule-- a rule that has been followed by Gaijin in the past.
In the case of Singapore, players are questioning why those vehicles would be deployed into the Chinese tech tree when by all established standards, those nations don’t make sense to be grouped together. Those players are questioning Gaijin’s creative decision.
That’s not hypocrisy or a double standard. Those are two separate issues.
5 Likes
Avoid one-man rule by the Bug Manager. A transparent issue review process is in place. Bug Managers must be supervised by the corresponding players. Players’ issues should be communicated with community management or the Bug Manager. Players will rate their performance, and the Bug Manager with the lowest rating will be removed annually.
Restore equipment performance. If the restored equipment is too strong, increase the corresponding combat weight.
Fix a large number of issues that have been approved but not implemented for a long time.
Players will participate in discussions on combat weight adjustments, raising questions and comparing vehicles with the same combat weight but different performance, or vehicles with similar performance but different combat weights.Officials need to give reasonable and convincing reasons to the majority of people。
Do your job and fulfill your responsibilities. If a person is recognized as not being able to do a job well, he should be replaced as soon as possible.
*Machine translation may not be accurate
Obviously, mentioning Singapore is a deliberate change of subject. What is China’s appeal, one of them is not mentioned, but it causes conflicts among players and deliberately shifts the contradictions.
1 Like
It’s not about questioning their stance, but rather about their opposition to integrating Singapore into the Chinese tech tree. The core reason is that if this integration happens, the Chinese tech tree would gain access to Singapore’s acquired F-35A and F-35B variants, in addition to China’s own stealth aircraft. This potential access is precisely what leads some players to ‘question’ the move, as you put it.
1 Like
You perceive these as two distinct issues, but they are essentially the same problem. Your opposition to Singapore’s inclusion in the Chinese tech tree is fundamentally the same as our opposition to Chinese export vehicles being added to the Japanese tree. Please don’t treat them as separate matters. If you insist on doing so, then we could just as strongly “demand” that Gaijin add Singaporean vehicles to the Chinese tree.
1 Like
All players should stick together. This is not just a problem facing China.
6 Likes
To be fair, the Oplot-T was always going to go Thailand under the JP TT. It’s a Thai tank.
2 Likes