Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

“Meet the Auction!” and this topic fighting to see which one turned more players against Gaijin

11 Likes

China shits out a new afv every other day. There is NO need for another subtree.

Oplot needs bt4a removed and the armor fixed, we all know they gave it the unrealistic round cause they nerfed the armor

2 Likes

VT4 will be added to the Japanese tech tree." It’s just a game. “Chinese players shouldn’t be so sensitive.” When Gaijin mentioned Singapore might be added to the Chinese tech tree: “This is unfair!” “Gaijin can’t do this!” This is your true face

5 Likes

We must show them they are wrong once again, we must take action.

The bug reports and forums do nothing. There is another way that has worked before

wew, i completely forgot about the auction being a thing

2 Likes

Vt4 is a Thai vehicle you guys cried so hard and took away from Thai players.

Singapore is just western copy-paste galore.

You already have m2k and will get an Abrams you don’t need anymore western stuff without ruining your own tt

6 Likes

Thank God that went nowhere

if china gets a subtree then add north korea lmao
i want them tanks with atgms and AA missiles lmao

9 Likes

Again stop it with the aggressive misinterpretation of the issue at hand.

Thai tank will be added to the already existing thai subtree and that is an issue

Why is thai tank in thai subtree an issue?

First, its not even in the game yet, unlike thai subtree. Second, no one says its unfair, people just dont think its a good idea due to several reasons outlined in this thread.

Comments such as these undermine the actual efforts of chinese community to actually get their vehicles fixed in the eyes on non-chinese community.

If you actually give the thread a read, you will find that most people actually agree that some chinese vehicles are in dire need of fixing, and this was said multiple times.

Bug report site issues are systemic, and affect everyone, not just single nation.

Current format is no longer sustainable. Bug reports being dismissed without any explanation, if explanation is given players have few chances to actually dispute the reasoning of bug reporting managers, and even if the bug report is accepted, its being slept on for literal years.

Community should be banding together and demand changes to the bug reporting site as a whole.

17 Likes

It wont while its anon and they just use players that volunteer who will absolutley have major biases (i dont need to say who im referring to and best i dont)

if they continue to use volunteers make it so a each nation has its own tech mods (multiple) for air, ground and sea. We shouldnt be relying on gunjob and only a couple others to pick up the slack and fix biased false “not a bug” flaggings

4 Likes

They’re only trying to divide everyone Don’t fall for it please

2 Likes

Find me an M1 and M3

What if they just added stuff to the most logical place, Leo 2SG to Germany, F-15SG to US, the one M113 modification to Israel, etc.

dis?


Wrong M1 and M3 :P

US Army needs to do better

Funnily enough I recall something about them being anonymous as result of one bug report manager being doxxed few years back.

For the exact same approach of labeling everything as “not a bug” without further explanation.

Now I dont condone such behaviour, but clearly just making the bug report managers anonymous didnt fix the issues and frustration of the playerbase at all.

1 Like

ohh ok


3 Likes

I was referring to that. I wont mention who because last time i did the thread got locked instantly and i want discussion to be free.

the guy annoyed too many people

Spoiler

Still does

I see.

1 Like