They already have a lot of unique vehicles not being added to the game and have been left in the suggested vehicles for years both Taiwan and China.
2 Likes
Yeah nah. China is big enough to have its own tree. The only thing missing is its navak tree which was almost non existent when ww2 ended.
3 Likes
Don’t let the Chinese playerbase bully you into what vehicles you can and can’t add to the game. Who cares about the politics of it, Thailand operated the VT-4 and there shouldn’t be any reason against adding it to the Subtree within Japan.
Please no, Taiwan and Pakistan are the most logical subtrees to provide China with, it doesn’t really need anything more than that.
10 Likes
Honestly, if the Chinese tech tree didn’t face so many unresolved issues, I believe Chinese players wouldn’t mind the VT4 being added to the Japanese tree. But here’s the problem: the internal model of the VT4 is completely different from the VT4A1’s—anyone can clearly see that the autoloader in the VT4 is modeled higher than the one in the VT4A1. So why has no one addressed the incorrect autoloader height in the VT4A1? I truly don’t understand.
25 Likes
“no senator, im singaporean”
6 Likes
In Chinese community,nobody care about Singapore TT join China’s TT or not
But China vehicle go into Jap’s TT？It piss off almost everybody
7 Likes
Hot take Naval will get fun when post cold war really comes to game
This is not a situation where we need to act separately. Gaijin is in the wrong here for refusing to address existing issues for one nation, then deciding to make another nation suffer for it because they think it’s easier.
Singaporean players voiced their concerns just like Chinese players, both were ignored. The issue is what Gaijin is doing here and all players need to work together to make that clear.
21 Likes
North Korea will go to my own personal tech tree that only I have access to
1 Like
I was never aware of this issue. Does the damage model also have a big difference too? Thank you for bringing it to my attention and many others. We all want vehicles to be properly modeled in game.
only if you allow me to use one of those freaky t-55s with an igla on the back from time to time
If you want to solve the problems you raised, you should post more. At least in the Chinese community, the consensus is that China doesn’t need Singaporean vehicles, but some people just want to do skin-changing items to save work.（look
m44 and m55）
4 Likes
“You can’t make everyone happy, but you can make everyone unhappy."
4 Likes
1 Like
welcome to the club.
Germany suffers the same fate.
So many unique ground vehicles and alternatives to existing vehicles.
Our air tree is quite poor and not many options.
Do we get more ground vehicles unique to germany out of it? Nup.
Dunno what happend to all our export variants / tech demonstrators and so on.
6 Likes
I’m not in the game right now, but if you’re online, you can check the internal models yourself to compare them.
reminds me of how crazy the Rumors thread was while waiting for the trailer
3 Likes
I don’t have access to the CDK so i can’t check. I dont knkw if the in game viewer is accurate to actual damage models
So… If i get this correctly.
People from Thailand aren’t allowed to play their MBT’s in the Japanese TT because Chinese people don’t want that? What does the Chinese Community even have to do with Thai vehicles being added to Japan in the first place?
Then after that, Singapore to China… So Thai people can’t play their MBT’s in their given position, but Chinese people can play NATO vehicles in theirs?
The best part comes now - Why can China have Japanese vehicles in their TT, but Thailand can’t have their vehicles in the Japanese TT?
@magazine2 So, the Chinese community has the final say to what is being added to the Japanese TT?
36 Likes