i dont want to be controversial or get send to eternal doom but i feel like chinese player are sensitive when japan get something
9 Likes
They already have NATO vehicles in their TT.
Or BR changes threads
Always fun to watch the chaos of gaijin’s poor choices
8 Likes
does the people of france, united kingodm, usa, israel and germany get a veto option to not have their equipment added to the chinese TT like how the chinese players acts like they can veto the VT4 to the thai tree
12 Likes
well it came from gaijin themselves so it has to be taken seriously
actually they are modified T-62
1 Like
understatement of the century
7 Likes
should’ve clarified, was talking abt Singapore → CHN
1 Like
This is VT4
This is VT4A1
19 Likes
im on thin ice so i cant say anything huge
2 Likes
So basically Gaijin wrote a whole essay just to say: “Trust us bro, it’s all about balance and fun, nothing political here.”
Lots of nice PR words, zero actual answers. VT-4 in the Japanese tree? “We’re just thinking about it.” Chinese vehicle issues? “Language barriers, sorry!”
It really feels like they’re sweeping the real problems under the rug while patting themselves on the back for “listening to feedback.”
32 Likes
the kind of de-escalation tactics i see on a barely certified USA policeman
4 Likes
1 Like
I think the chinese community wants their vehicles they develop on their tech tree and other vehicles on other vehicles tech tree.
So i dont think they want Singapore stuff to china
8 Likes
3 Likes
you moved? TASER TASER TASER
Chinese player doesn’t want Singapore sub TT, They expressed their opposition last year when the leak shows.
25 Likes
I dont think anyone wants that to be honest. Not just chinese players.
1 Like
not all. you can also see others claim every related vehicles.
Most would think this a bad idea.
So… just Gaijin being Gaijin
1 Like