Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

tldr for anyone not wanting to read this: We saw lotta hate from Chinese playerbase which hurt our bottom line really bad so we will wait for it to all cooldown and add it later. Also pls don’t review bomb us again.

7 Likes

Sweet. Does this mean we can finally get BOL in a historically accurate state as the current state was a balance change that contradicts the principle of realism you want to “maintain”.

Looking forward to the Tornado Gr1 finally getting Mk103 engines and the Challenger 2 finally being fixed

10 Likes

In my opinion, this entire discussion is a waste of everyone’s time. What we need are concrete solutions, not irrelevant ramblings that evade the real issues.

The core goal of Chinese players has always been to resolve the ongoing problems facing the Chinese tech tree. You cannot keep diverting the conversation with unrelated remarks to avoid addressing these concerns.

17 Likes

India to britain kinda stupid mentality

2 Likes

classic gaijin xd

No they’re very much aware of that sensitivity. ASEAN was leaked to be confirmed for China, then delayed. The Leopard 2A4 (48th SAR) was leaked to be Squadron for China, but was then delayed. Either they keep delaying it or are cancelling it altogether.

Hopefully cancelling. Its a horrible idea.

12 Likes

SURELY tornado gr.1 will be SAVED by mk103 SURELY SURELY SURELY

The Singapore tech tree is a topic that gives us Chinese tech vehicles a vehicle that isn’t quite as discriminated against, and a joke about foreigners just copy-pasting again. If foreigners actually did a good job on Chinese vehicles, we wouldn’t need Singapore at all.

5 Likes

9M for harrier T10 hell yea

2 Likes

That was the reason i mentioned the tor, yes china uses it, but its russian it belongs to the russian tech tree the HQ17 is different tho since its modded by the Chinese

That doesn’t change anything, China has plenty of vehicles to add and North Korea is a perfectly good nation for subtrees to fulfil the mid tiers.

4 Likes

Apparently the Chinese version of this post does not mention a Singapore subtree at all from what I can tell.

2 Likes

Im all for chinese vehicles being properly implemented. I don’t think anyone is against that. The issue that the community has with the chinese community is that chinese players get upset when an export vehicle is added to an export nation.
I fully support china being implemented properly.

2 Likes

Being political sensitive is like giving discounts on several JP planes on the exact day that Pearl Harbor got bombed.
TBH it’s true that Gaijin is free to make any discounts anytime, but it’s still not a good idea to do it like that.

9 Likes

that’s too logical
north korea will go to france
because france owned vietnam which is an asian country that was communist and so is north korea
so north korea will go to france as a subtree
-Gaijin

1 Like

Yeah so rules are going just one way, poor chineese players get anything they want but putting copypastes of others nations is fine.

And Singapore is not needed at all for China, that makes absolutely no sense.

4 Likes

T72 clones and american jets from TaoBao are not deserving of a full TT, china should have been a USSR tech tree to keep the communist states together and create a fully fledged tree across the board

I think it doesn’t matter. Compared to additional vehicles, I’d rather see the Chinese vehicles adjusted to their proper level based on accurate data and analysis rather than just relying on their guesses and incorrect formula calculations.

4 Likes

not to mention , that no matter how it gets turned.
The chinese tech tree is 2 nations from the start. China and Taiwan.
It would get plenty western vehicles from the start thanks to Taiwan.
There is no need to throw another nation into it

2 Likes

The Chinese announcement mentioned it was merely a plan; whether it gets implemented depends on what they actually do. It’s just a tool for ganjin to take the heat.