Information Regarding the Thai Subtree and Chinese Vehicles

Surely we should add ukraine to the russian tree )))

8 Likes

They’ve managed to piss off both the Chinese community (with a nothingburger response), and the global community (with Singapore to China, and a nothingburger response).

I am curious to hear more from Chinese people what they think of a potential Singapore subtree, but I have a feeling most would prefer domestic planes to be added.

18 Likes

Gaijin have been really good at Creating a solution for a problem.

1 Like

I dont really mind the nations I just hate copy and paste

2 Likes

They are going to eventually

1 Like

14 Likes

It’s been happening for awhile, 🤷‍♂️

Letting every Nation get Every Vehicle is not a good idea, im just waiting for the freak out when Russia gets a Leopard or a Abrams. ( After China gets theirs lol)

China has alot of cool stuff that can be added, that isn’t russian stuff like the Tor or other nato vehicles that doesn’t belong.

6 Likes

It’s likely not a confirmation, in-fact it could be a poor wording of a statement.
Either way, poor wording, intentional confirmation, it’s not a unifying statement.

Chinese tree should be split into:

•PRC+DPRK+Pakistan+Bangladesh

•ROC+ROK+Singapore

2 Likes

oh 110%, as expected

1 Like

Gaijin likes to roll the dice between pissing off the entire community or letting a certain community cry

4 Likes

My bad for voicing my opinion under something that mentions that, and Chinese can still read the Q&A anyways

still a confirm of having this thought.
showing gaijin’s ignorance of political sensitivity

Tor is not so a good example, after all it’s actually being used and other similar domestic things are developed through it. like many other Russian stuffs in China TT

This whole thing seems like a whole lot of nothing…

It starts out with the question how subtrees are decided, and completely dances around the question just to giving actual criteria. This whole section seems to only be there to say:

…and hope that this would hide the fact that in the second part the actual issues of the Chinese community are skipped over.

Essentially what is being said here is that nothing will change, issues will be fixed same as they always are and any non-bug related issues such as the treatment of China (modern day superpower rivaling the USA) as a minor nation are being ignored.

So essentially what is happening here is stupid at best, actively insulting two nations at worst.

Singaporean players, that have already voiced their opinions against being added to the Chinese tree more than clearly in the past, most notably during a massive backlash last December, are being thrown under the bus just because Gaijin wants an excuse to not solve the issues Chinese players brought up.

66 Likes

Singapore for China.

How about:
Ukraine to Russia
Iran to Israel
India/Pakistan

30 Likes

Yeah i agree. Using the tor as an example is stupid

1 Like

tldr for anyone not wanting to read this: We saw lotta hate from Chinese playerbase which hurt our bottom line really bad so we will wait for it to all cooldown and add it later. Also pls don’t review bomb us again.

9 Likes

Sweet. Does this mean we can finally get BOL in a historically accurate state as the current state was a balance change that contradicts the principle of realism you want to “maintain”.

Looking forward to the Tornado Gr1 finally getting Mk103 engines and the Challenger 2 finally being fixed

11 Likes

In my opinion, this entire discussion is a waste of everyone’s time. What we need are concrete solutions, not irrelevant ramblings that evade the real issues.

The core goal of Chinese players has always been to resolve the ongoing problems facing the Chinese tech tree. You cannot keep diverting the conversation with unrelated remarks to avoid addressing these concerns.

19 Likes