Type 96b
Type 99(aps)
Type 100
Ztq-15
Ludun
Fk2000
Amphibious vehicles
Airborn ifvs
Normal ifv and mgs systems
China have too many options on its own
2 Likes
yeah, i just lost focus on a second and wrote some stupidity, but ment chile to israel
so, basically, they would add up several (~10) unique AFVs and anti-tank machines, and that`s all i see here
There is many machines here but basically most of them are just clones of existing ones if we talk about singaporean and chile machnery…
what`s the difference between it and the two 96s ingame?
Ah, the ZTZ99 with APS? Okay, lets count
the “Armata” of china? I dont think its the day we can argue to add it anyway, so no
but china already has the VT-5, isnt it like the same vehicle?
what`s this? Seems google does not know it
isnt it just a concept? thy it looks pretty cool, i would love to see it ingame
would like to know more abut them
the PTL and the WMA are pretty OP on their own, what`s “normal” then?
Do your own research mate
1 Like
There’s unique variants of existing vehicles, I’d call those unique. Either way, it’d help the Israeli tree massively and is really the only place Singapore + Chile fit.
the reason i ask is to not make research as they are the people who already did it and can introduce me to results. Why would i do it as this is just to introduce some chinese vehicles, not balance them or anything?
i looked up some of the WW2`s models and didnt find many uniques tho. Yes, there are some machines that arent ingame now, like the Chaffie HVMS, but then again, there are not so much tanks that are marked as “chile” and “singapore”, and they are mostly have little to no difference at all or just dont belong (as the M14 with a machinegun for example), and the most unique are certainly the AFVs
1200hp engine, upgraded armor and more reverse.
IRL it’s less armor one but here may be more.
it don’t have composite armor but heavy era
1 Like
Leopard 2A4 Procaco is essentially the 2A4 on drugs (New Thermals, LWS, possibly more armour, APS + more modern round)
Leopard 2A4 MCS is basically the 2A4 but with “Multispectral Cloak” (not sure how it’d perform in game, likely overperform looking at DIRCM)
M-50 HVMS “Super Sherman” (M-51 with 60mm HVMS Autocannon)
M-51 “Proyecto-T” - Modernised M-51 with better armour, engine, LRF
Leopard 1V (Modified from Dutch, has spaced armour, NVD, APFSDS-T (Hetz-7), ATGM (LAHAT)
I didnt manage to even find a description of that modernization, but is sounds as the ztz-99-2 or ztz-99-3 except the reverse speed
OOOF, looks cool. Unusable, but cool
so, the 2a4 with a new shot, does not sound to me as not clone tho
HAH! Well, that one really does look funny! that one i definetly would like to see ingame, even if it practically a clone
does it?! I read that it utilizes the same cannon as the HVG, so no autoloaded there is. But if it DOES, and the game would make it the “casette” loading… Wow!
the 105mm ATGM? Didnt know that L7 could use it
Oh, yeah, you are right, totaly forgot about that one
Oh you are right, I forgot about some of the, didnt know Prendergast was Canadian and forgot about Skink (and hopefully I will forget about it again with how much I dislike it especially at its current BR), I was writing it purely from memory so I forgot about some of them.
B will be the answer.
1 Like
The best and real one.
All of these examples were added before the Idea of Sub-Trees. Just to be clear.
True. Is just GAIJIN try to distract you guys and me Thai player catches the stray bullets from this BS. I just want to play with Thai line up 😭
T 80U certainly was not, it was added at the same update as finland.
1 Like
T 80U is also a trialed vehicle and not really a good choice for an argument about subtrees especially when none of the Swedish subtrees looked at it aside from the main nation itself.
Best examples would’ve been the Finnish Vehicles on Germany and the SA Vehicle on Germany as both came before the addition of subtrees.
2 Likes
They have already deleted every possible counter-post.